I think you're overrating our D if you believe we're an average blue-line.
Agree to disagree, I suppose.
Actually, I think it's not far from the truth
Karlsson is better than most #1 (but still has to find a way to be less risky)
Methot is actually a decent #2 (a #3 on contenders)
Ceci is developing at a very fast rate, already very good on the 2nd pairing, I have no problem comparing him vs other teams #3
Cowen, despite what people think, is efficient as a #4
Phillips in a good physical shape like now is at least a good #5
Borowiecki looks to be a solid #6
Wiercioch and Gryba are not perfect but which teams has a #7-8 like that?
Very underrated blue-line just because of results last year and the fact that they were 27th for GA. But the preceding year, they were 2nd overall
I know a certain poster (like always) spread the idea like propaganda that the SV% was the ONLY reason the Sens were 2nd OA in GA in 2012-13 but it's not entirely accurate (and people bought it like gospel). It's a LOT more complicated than that and I don't have all the time in the world to explain things over and over again so I'll just say : system efficiency, forwards not cheating, focus on team defense FIRST.
They are a very young inexperienced team (been saying that for like 2 years but now someone posted NHL games per team as evidence), of course sometimes they look disorganized but the number of shots against has a lot to do with the system and positioning they play. It's also a team who likes to trade chances (a bit like run and gun) but they exaggerated way too much last year (going all in on offense too often), and were getting outscored because other goalies were "outdueling" ours and teams were more composed and structured (experience being a big reason for that). Still managed to get 88 pts on a crappy year.
Difference so far is responsibility for TEAM DEFENSE, some players might have "disappointing" stats for some, but it's defense first, no more cheating. Sens are actually 9th in GA with 2.00; I'm not sure they will stay top-10 all season but I'm pretty much certain they will adjust from last year and prove to culprits that they are not "terrible". I know I'm going to have a lot of fun with this, watching people cursing at defense all year just to show that the stats are far from bad.
But oh yeah, it's only the goalies... I believe we have one of the best duos in the league. Problem last year is they both had a long bad stretch (about 18 games each), but if you play compact defense like 2012-13 and so far this year, you're going to make them look good. It's a bit like Elliott in St-Louis except that he plays for Hitchcock (more experienced coach) and behind a more experienced team. His stats are inflated by the composure of the team in front of him. Sens can do that a bit, as evidenced in the past, just more inexperienced and with a bigger number of shots against boxing out to the perimeter)
* Lehner's rebound control is also a big factor why teams shoot a lot against him...
Here's for the facts that I can think of right now