I get that it’s fun to crap on habs fans but I think Anderson at 2.75 would actually garner a lot of interest around the league
Not like a 1st+ return though, which means there’s no point in Montreal burning a retention slot because he plays a role for them and they have enough 2nd/mid picks already
Exactly. It just makes more sense as a value proposition, for the Habs to use that retention slot on retaining a guy like Savard/Evans/Armia on an expiring contract down to absolutely dirt cheap to completely maximize the return on whichever of them...
Especially because that means they'll also have all their retention slots back and cleared up to use on whatever they feel like next year, and the year after that. Which is more compounding potential "value" to be had on guys. Whereas Anderson...you're locked in to that slot being used and you only get that "value bump" for retention one time over the course of three years.
I think if Josh Anderson is going to be moved with multiple years remaining on his deal...it'd be more likely a case of taking back some other sort of "bad contract" with similar term, rather than retention. But the Habs don't necessarily have a lot of incentive to even move him at all right now. He's still a useful enough player for them...and the price a team will pay isn't likely to move the needle much for the Habs who are already overflowing with mid picks and prospects.
Logical posts here. As you guys said it doesn't make sense for Montreal to use a retention slot for 2.5 seasons in this instance, unless the return is a 1st... Stranger things have happened and I could see a GM doing that at 50%, but it seems somewhat unlikely.For the 3rd rounder Anderson would return at 50%, not worth the retention slot the Habs must utilize.
Here is the truth... Anderson isn't traded until the next deadline a year+ from now when he's a rental.
The better play is to use the last retention slot on Dvorak (expiring) and get the same 3rd round pick without having to burn the retention slot over over two seasons.
I would prefer if Hughes didn't get caught with his pants down by Sakic and the Avs for a third straight time. Thanks.Colorado have long had an interest in Josh Anderson due to his skating. I wonder if they'd be willing to put together a decent offer for Anderson if he came at 50% retention.
The Avs typically dont trade 1sts unless they absolutely have to, i.e. the only 1st's they've traded lately was for Sean Walker to dump Johansen, and for Kuemper, both of which were necessary moves rather than by choice. So a 1st for Anderson at 50% probably isn't realistic. They have 2 2nd rounders in this year's draft, but no 3rd rounders. So the logical offer would need to involve one or both of the 2025 2nd's (from Carolina and NYR). The NYR 2025 2nd might end up being pretty high if NYR continue trending downwards, would that be a good enough pick to get a conversation started?
Colorado have long had an interest in Josh Anderson due to his skating. I wonder if they'd be willing to put together a decent offer for Anderson if he came at 50% retention.
The Avs typically dont trade 1sts unless they absolutely have to, i.e. the only 1st's they've traded lately was for Sean Walker to dump Johansen, and for Kuemper, both of which were necessary moves rather than by choice. So a 1st for Anderson at 50% probably isn't realistic. They have 2 2nd rounders in this year's draft, but no 3rd rounders. So the logical offer would need to involve one or both of the 2025 2nd's (from Carolina and NYR). The NYR 2025 2nd might end up being pretty high if NYR continue trending downwards, would that be a good enough pick to get a conversation started?
Fair points. I agree that it would probably take a 1st at 50%, maybe even with a plus. i was just presenting what the thought process would realistically be from the Avs perspective. There's probably no deal to be made here unless CMac changes the way he operates and is willing to send a 1st.I think if we were to retain 50% for the rest of this season and two more seasons, we would expect a late 1st rounder at a min. I get it, Anderson has been bounced around these boards for a while now but he has also been bounced all over our roster over the years as well. That same thing happened to Lehkonen and I'm sure the Avs are very happy with Lehkonen. MSL has finally found a stable spot for him and the results show this year.
Anderson's "popularity" on social media chat forums is low but I just don't see it being that low with actual NHL GM's. In the past with a lower cap, it was more difficult to move. At 50% retention with a much higher cap? Come on man.. that has a lot of value. It's not that easy to acquire a big man that skates like this and plays physical... for $2.75M AAV. For 3 playoff runs? I think some of you are guilty of not wanting to pay the 1st rounder because you are afraid of what other fans say. Throw the popular bandwagon party out the window... it's not true reality.
I wish Anderson was a bit younger and locked up for 5 years today. The only reason why I am offering him at 50% retention is because his term left doesn't really fall in line with our window (Maybe his last season does). Curious to see what we can get for him with this retention but not getting the traction on these boards anyways. Habs are not after 2nd or 3rd rounders at this point in time. We are loaded with them already and it's a weak draft after pick 20 ish.
Fair points. I agree that it would probably take a 1st at 50%, maybe even with a plus. i was just presenting what the thought process would realistically be from the Avs perspective. There's probably no deal to be made here unless CMac changes the way he operates and is willing to send a 1st.
For the 3rd rounder Anderson would return at 50%, not worth the retention slot the Habs must utilize.
Here is the truth... Anderson isn't traded until the next deadline a year+ from now when he's a rental.
The better play is to use the last retention slot on Dvorak (expiring) and get the same 3rd round pick without having to burn the retention slot over over two seasons.
Thanks, that all makes sense. Anderson would definitely have suitors with retention.No doubt about it, Sakic does not like to trade 1st rounders (even late 1st rounders). GM's on contenders do make these moves more than what Sakic has. I respect that angle from the Avs.
If I was on the other side, I'd want to acquire Anderson at $2.75M as well and for cheap. It's just business and I take no offense to it. Thank you for not trashing Anderson like some others do. He's got game and he can really help a contender. I've brought up the Anderson talk lately but I do feel that NHL GM's will call Hughes about Anderson as we get closer to the TDL. Maybe a quick conversation but they will inquire. He does has term left and if you are going to pay futures you rather not, it's better than just a rental. What winger that is available at this TDL is better than Anderson? I have not really dug into that list.
Thanks, that all makes sense. Anderson would definitely have suitors with retention.
Other bottom 6 wingers available at the TDL that also got mentioned in Frank Seravallis trade board yesterday are Bjorkstrand, Armia, Tanev, Frederic, Evans, Gourde, Nyquist. Likely none of them would warrant a 1st (maybe Evans), so GM's would probably be more willing to trade for them instead of Anderson. But Anderson does have term though, and intangibles like size and speed. Guess we'll see. Whatever the case I think if his name is out there the Avs will definitely be a team kicking tyres.
He is overpaid for sure but he is worth more to The Habs than they would get for him. They are better off keeping him for that bottom 6Not much talk about Anderson trades these days but I can see it picking up, as we get closer to the TDL. Lebrun quote: I do think teams will call the Habs again about Anderson.
No idea how aggressive teams would get but I can see some solid offers being made. Big boy that skates well and can play physical. Seems to have stablized himself in a 3rd line role and a great penalty killer.
He is overpaid for sure but he is worth more to The Habs than they would get for him. They are better off keeping him for that bottom 6
Avs already added Drury who is looking good at 3C, and also have Parssinen, Colton, and Kelly who can play C in the bottom 6, so I don't think they're going to be a team involved in the Evans sweepstakes even though he'd definitely be a nice fit.Both Evans and Anderson (50% retention) would be great adds for the Avs depth. Not sure if we can agree on the return but I can see the Avs turning their depth around by adding these two and also getting Evans to stay like Lehkonen.
I have no idea what Gorton/Hughes will do. I think they are delaying the extension with Evans until the TDL so they can see what the offers are first. Lets say they are getting difficulty with low offers (2nd and B prospects) for Evans but at the same time, he is asking for 5x $4.5M (which is too much).... It's very possible they keep him and reengage on July 1st. Do you see any team giving Evans his max deal? I think if that is what he is after, he might get it from a cap floor team.
Gourde is one I like. Great skater and works very hard. His takeaways/60 is still very solid at age 33.
Avs already added Drury who is looking good at 3C, and also have Parssinen, Colton, and Kelly who can play C in the bottom 6, so I don't think they're going to be a team involved in the Evans sweepstakes even though he'd definitely be a nice fit.
Ditto for Gourde. The Avs ideally need an upgrade on Mittelstadt but at this point Gourde isn't really that. He's more of an elite 3c than a 2C.
Yeah there's definitely a shortage of top 6 C's and top 4 RHD's. Those are the Avs two biggest needs as well.Seems to be a 2C and top 4RD shortage. Habs are looking for both and we would like an upgrade on Dach as well. Not like either fan bases hate Mittelstadt or Dach but we want better. I actually think both players will be good centers but my problem is it will take a few more years to fully mature.
Who's your 4th line center?
Yeah there's definitely a shortage of top 6 C's and top 4 RHD's. Those are the Avs two biggest needs as well.
Mittelstadt was good in last years playoffs, and also PPG through the first 20 or so games this year, but then fell off completely. Seems like he just doesn't have the stamina to play in Bednars fast-paced system for a whole season. But on most teams he'd be a fine 2C, as he was when he arrived in Colorado with fresh legs.
If there's a 2C replacement out there then I'm sure CMac would listen to offers on Mittelstadt. Or maybe they try Necas at 2C and see if that works. If it does then Mittelstadt would surely get traded, either for a RHD or a forward, or alternatively just for futures.
The Avs center depth right now is Mackinnon-Mittelstadt-Drury-Kelly. Then there's also Colton who was the teams 3C last year and parts of this year, and Parssinen who has probably done enough to earn more looks at C but there just isn't the spot for him with Mackinnon, Mittelstadt, and Drury holding down those spots.
I dunno man .. Anderson at 50%.. as an Oilers fan I'd pay a first for that
He also sucks in the playoffs and can't produce. I'm not seeing what everybody else is when it comes to Anderson. Yes he's big but who f***ing cares if he's mediocre at playing hockey?...Anderson & Engvall is a typical terrible comparison (shockingly from a Leaf fan)...Anderson is a heavy physical forechecker with underrated speed, sticks up for teammates against anyone including League Heavy's, & has become a solid defensive player...nope, he hasn't lived up to that contract, but anyone thinking he couldn't nab a decent asset with retention (not that I think the Habs will retain to move him) when he's just the type of player many teams are looking for in a Playoff push are just fooling themselves...