Iron Balls McGinty
Registered User
- Aug 5, 2005
- 9,536
- 7,698
Fair enough, but I don't think he's the problem either. He's not the same player Philly drafted him to be considering he was picked 1 spot before Werenski but he provides different value in the league.I am a big fan of defense and have been complaining about our defense for years. Provorov is not the answer.
I also think that if we are to be a winner in the next couple of years, I don't know who the replacement is that helps us do that. And no, Mateychuk is not the replacement. I think keeping both of them makes us closer to consistent defensive play than only having one of them. I don't think it is a coincidence that the defense has played better with both of them and Z in the lineup.
Is there a capable fit out there that would be cheaper? Maybe but unproven risk has its own price. NJ got lucky with value shopping with Kovecevic but I think if you can get Provorov close to the 6 yr deal and realitically a bit higher AAV than what Pesce did for NJ you do it. We don't know what his motivations are outside of knowing he'd like to stay here. It's all spitballing speculation that he'll require 8 years to stay.
Whatever DW does, he'd better have a plan. Letting him go without an upgrade plan should not be an option because regression in this team space is not going to be acceptable.