Prospect Info: Ivan Demidov (2024 5th OA): SKA St. Petersburg (KHL)

Demidov will be so much fun to watch. Especially as a continuation of the Hutson mesmerization of opponents.

Right now, Hab players are a little bewildered themselves when Hutson puts his skills on display. I think that Demidov would be more of a keep that shit going once he got the puck from Hutson.

Demidov and Hutson are both reasons why we need skilled players in the top-6, at least, able to read developing plays in order to complete them. Otherwise, you end up with two special layers playing as one-man shows by necessity from others being unable to capitalize on their creativity and talent.

Laine fits into this category as a 'finisher'. It might not be the sexiest, but his ability to rifle that puck in à la Ovechkin is nothing to smirk at.

I don't know what the chemistry will be between Demidov and other top-6 options on the Habs, but players able to see the ice and creative enough to exploit what they see developing are clearly Suzuki, Caufield and Slafkovsky. The younger Mouseketeer doesn't get enough credit for his on ice vision that makes him want to be a playmaker more than a shooter (despite the good one-timer).

I would even be comfortable playing both Caufield and Laine on the same line since Caufield would benefit from Laine as a pass option to keep opponents guessing, rather than being a de facto shooter. This season Caufield has shown that he can be a dynamic puck carrier on his line and has exploited moving the defensive box by skating into different zones with the puck.

An opponent (or two) covering Laine would open up the ice to allow Caufield more room to shoot on net. Focusing on Caufield because of a high success rate when he shoots would open up shooting lanes for Laine to exploit.

It might not be the best option, but I would also consider a top-6 of:

Slafkovsky - Suzuki - Demidov
Caufield - Dach - Laine

Slafkovsky would add size to get pucks in the corners and playmaking to exploit two shooters like Demidov and Suzuki. Bot Demidov and Suzuki would have each other as pass options and Slafkovsky could well surprise opponents with his one-timer to keep everyone honest.

IMO, both Suzuki and Slafkocvsky are smart enough to Keep up with Demidov's creativity.

Dach, more of a playmaker than a shooter, would have two sniper options and Caufield could become the hybrid sniper/passer to keep opponents honest.
 
Demidov will be so much fun to watch. Especially as a continuation of the Hutson mesmerization of opponents.

Right now, Hab players are a little bewildered themselves when Hutson puts his skills on display. I think that Demidov would be more of a keep that shit going once he got the puck from Hutson.

Demidov and Hutson are both reasons why we need skilled players in the top-6, at least, able to read developing plays in order to complete them. Otherwise, you end up with two special layers playing as one-man shows by necessity from others being unable to capitalize on their creativity and talent.

Laine fits into this category as a 'finisher'. It might not be the sexiest, but his ability to rifle that puck in à la Ovechkin is nothing to smirk at.

I don't know what the chemistry will be between Demidov and other top-6 options on the Habs, but players able to see the ice and creative enough to exploit what they see developing are clearly Suzuki, Caufield and Slafkovsky. The younger Mouseketeer doesn't get enough credit for his on ice vision that makes him want to be a playmaker more than a shooter (despite the good one-timer).

I would even be comfortable playing both Caufield and Laine on the same line since Caufield would benefit from Laine as a pass option to keep opponents guessing, rather than being a de facto shooter. This season Caufield has shown that he can be a dynamic puck carrier on his line and has exploited moving the defensive box by skating into different zones with the puck.

An opponent (or two) covering Laine would open up the ice to allow Caufield more room to shoot on net. Focusing on Caufield because of a high success rate when he shoots would open up shooting lanes for Laine to exploit.

It might not be the best option, but I would also consider a top-6 of:

Slafkovsky - Suzuki - Demidov
Caufield - Dach - Laine

Slafkovsky would add size to get pucks in the corners and playmaking to exploit two shooters like Demidov and Suzuki. Bot Demidov and Suzuki would have each other as pass options and Slafkovsky could well surprise opponents with his one-timer to keep everyone honest.

IMO, both Suzuki and Slafkocvsky are smart enough to Keep up with Demidov's creativity.

Dach, more of a playmaker than a shooter, would have two sniper options and Caufield could become the hybrid sniper/passer to keep opponents honest.
I like your top 6:
Slafkovsky - Suzuki - Demidov
Caufield - Dach - Laine

Will be interesting to see where the chemistry is. Would be good to try a lot of options. I've also always been curious how Laine would do with Suzuki:

Laine - Suzuki - Demidov
Caufield - Dach - Slaf

Caufield - Suzuki - Laine
Slaf - Dach - Demidov

Laine - Suzuki - Slaf
Caufield - Dach - Demidov
 
  • Like
Reactions: waitin425
I prefer to keep Caufield and Laine separate to spread out the scoring threats. Pair Caufield and Slaf and Laine and Demidov.

Pick whatever center you want for either pair. Suzuki or Dach.

That being said, that's my preference, I'd try anything to find the right chemistry.
 
  • Like
Reactions: David Suzuki
I’d rather the team upgrades at C to support Demi then break up one of the better 5v5 lines in the league. Remember the goal isn’t to get Demi as many points as possible, it is to build great lines and that process usually doesn’t include breaking up one that is already there.

And Demidov is as good as he looks, he should be able to do just fine with Dach and Laine, or wherever they put him.
 
I’d rather the team upgrades at C to support Demi then break up one of the better 5v5 lines in the league. Remember the goal isn’t to get Demi as many points as possible, it is to build great lines and that process usually doesn’t include breaking up one that is already there.

And Demidov is as good as he looks, he should be able to do just fine with Dach and Laine, or wherever they put him.

that is a terrible approach, the best prospect we have drafted in 20 years and the plan should be to stick him with a young center that we still don't know if he will be our long term center because he should be able to do just fine. How about putting your best prospect in the best chance to have success?
 
I prefer to keep Caufield and Laine separate to spread out the scoring threats. Pair Caufield and Slaf and Laine and Demidov.

Pick whatever center you want for either pair. Suzuki or Dach.

That being said, that's my preference, I'd try anything to find the right chemistry.
I think you HAVE spread out the scoring threats by having Demidov on a different line than Caufield and Laine.

Out of the following 6 players - Suzuki, Laine, Caufield, Demidov, Dach, Slafkovsky - you have four bonafide scores in Susuki, Laine, Caufield and Demidov, plus two potential 20-goal scorers who can pass the puck in Slafkovsky and Dach.

By keeping two of the bonafide scorers on each line in your top-6, you are spreading the offensive wealth and splitting Dach and Slafkovsky adds a playmaker that can still score on each line.

With Demidov, a natural lefty playing RW - just like Laine - they should not play them on the same line.

It can be any of:

Caufield - Suzuki - Demidov
Slafkovsky - Dach - Laine

-OR-

Slafkovsky - Suzuki - Demidov
Caufield - Dach - Laine

-OR-

Caufield - Suzuki - Laine
Slafkovsky - Dach - Demidov

-OR-

Slafkovsky - Suzuki - Laine
Caufield - Dach - Demidov
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad