SomeDude
Registered User
None of the other refs fought him? So much for standing up for your teammate.
Why don't these mistakes apply to the ref and his positioning?? Because you know that refs are never accountable for their mistakes
Why does this not apply to the ref?
Well if that were true then players would be hitting the referees all the time with clearings and dump/shoot ins but they know where they are and it’s extremely rare they get hit.A hockey player's brain will have learned to conpartmentalize and ignore the referee, since he's not part of the game. The ref's job on the other hand is to get out of the way, which he failed at. It's always good to see people bootlicking and standing up for the incompetence of authority figures.
Well if that were true then players would be hitting the referees all the time with clearings and dump/shoot ins but they know where they are and it’s extremely rare they get hit.
It becomes second nature to avoid them is more likely what you meant, not ignore them.
Abuse of official penalties carry either a 3, 10 or 20 game suspensions. 3 games for verbal abuse, 10 for physical and 20 for an attempt to injureIs the 10 game suspension a mandatory minimum? I understand that brain farts happen, but he purposely pushed the ref (by accident), and that’s why he’s getting the 10.
Yup, you’re right.and players have spots on the ice where they expect the officials to be, the face off dot isnt one of them
Not a chance this was intentional but I guess you gotta make a statement with this sort of stuff.
I understand where you're coming from, but punishing a player for abuse of official should absolutely require the league to determine Beckman's intent, at least as best as they can.
Ref was playing left wing there thoughThe length of the suspension is not negotiable. Aggressive physical contact with officials, even if not 100% deliberate, threatens the integrity of the game.
Don't touch the officials. Period. The end.
Did not seem intentional and Beckman went immediately to try to help him up. Probably the Referees' union demanded severe action and it wasn't worth the NHL fighting over an AHL player at the end of the season.
40.2 Automatic Suspension – Category I – Any player who deliberately strikes an official and causes injury or who deliberately applies physical force in any manner against an official with intent to injure, or who in any manner attempts to injure an official shall be automatically suspended for not less than twenty (20) games. (For the purpose of the rule, “intent to injure” shall mean any physical force which a player knew or should have known could reasonably be expected to cause injury.)
Automatic Suspension – Category II – Any player who deliberately applies physical force to an official in any manner (excluding actions as set out in Category I), which physical force is applied without intent to injure, or who spits on an official, shall be automatically suspended for not less than ten (10) games.
Automatic Suspension – Category III – Any player who, by his actions, physically demeans an official or physically threatens an official by (but not limited to) throwing a stick or any other piece of equipment or object at or in the general direction of an official, shooting the puck at or in the general direction of an official, spitting at or in the general direction of an official, or who deliberately applies physical force to an official solely for the purpose of getting free of such an official during or immediately following an altercation shall be suspended for not less than three (3) games.
If a league is willing to let referees have the benefit of the doubt re: "intent to whistle" every game, I think it's only fair, on a case by case basis such as these rare instances, that a guy gets the same benefit.I can certainly understand where you're coming from, especially since I've watched Beckman a good amount and he's not a dirty guy, but how do you expect leagues to figure out what a player was thinking? I'm not aware of any reliable way to do that. If there's no reliable way to make something happen, you can't base your processes off it.
This was clearly unintentional. Punishment does not fit the crime.In position or out of position. He tried to. Beckman changed his path and the ref even puts his arm out. Beckman gave 0 f's.
Not necessarily. There are actions a player could take, like throwing a punch, where if he strikes a ref it doesn’t really matter if it was intentional or not.