Isles Prospect Adam Beckman Suspended 10 AHL Games for shoving Referee into the Boards | Page 4 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

Isles Prospect Adam Beckman Suspended 10 AHL Games for shoving Referee into the Boards

Why don't these mistakes apply to the ref and his positioning?? Because you know that refs are never accountable for their mistakes

Maybe check out the first paragraph in the post you quoted. Players are out of position all the time, it doesn't render them eligible to be hit. If the ref is doing his job poorly it should be dealt with by the head of officiating, not by some blind player blowing them up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: qcal1427
A hockey player's brain will have learned to conpartmentalize and ignore the referee, since he's not part of the game. The ref's job on the other hand is to get out of the way, which he failed at. It's always good to see people bootlicking and standing up for the incompetence of authority figures.
Well if that were true then players would be hitting the referees all the time with clearings and dump/shoot ins but they know where they are and it’s extremely rare they get hit.

It becomes second nature to avoid them is more likely what you meant, not ignore them.
 
Well if that were true then players would be hitting the referees all the time with clearings and dump/shoot ins but they know where they are and it’s extremely rare they get hit.

It becomes second nature to avoid them is more likely what you meant, not ignore them.

and players have spots on the ice where they expect the officials to be, the face off dot isnt one of them
 
Did not seem intentional and Beckman went immediately to try to help him up. Probably the Referees' union demanded severe action and it wasn't worth the NHL fighting over an AHL player at the end of the season.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigDaddyLurch
I understand where you're coming from, but punishing a player for abuse of official should absolutely require the league to determine Beckman's intent, at least as best as they can.

Not necessarily. There are actions a player could take, like throwing a punch, where if he strikes a ref it doesn’t really matter if it was intentional or not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tryamw
Did not seem intentional and Beckman went immediately to try to help him up. Probably the Referees' union demanded severe action and it wasn't worth the NHL fighting over an AHL player at the end of the season.

10 games is the mandatory minimum in this situation:

40.2 Automatic Suspension – Category I – Any player who deliberately strikes an official and causes injury or who deliberately applies physical force in any manner against an official with intent to injure, or who in any manner attempts to injure an official shall be automatically suspended for not less than twenty (20) games. (For the purpose of the rule, “intent to injure” shall mean any physical force which a player knew or should have known could reasonably be expected to cause injury.)

Automatic Suspension – Category II – Any player who deliberately applies physical force to an official in any manner (excluding actions as set out in Category I), which physical force is applied without intent to injure, or who spits on an official, shall be automatically suspended for not less than ten (10) games.

Automatic Suspension – Category III – Any player who, by his actions, physically demeans an official or physically threatens an official by (but not limited to) throwing a stick or any other piece of equipment or object at or in the general direction of an official, shooting the puck at or in the general direction of an official, spitting at or in the general direction of an official, or who deliberately applies physical force to an official solely for the purpose of getting free of such an official during or immediately following an altercation shall be suspended for not less than three (3) games.
 
I can certainly understand where you're coming from, especially since I've watched Beckman a good amount and he's not a dirty guy, but how do you expect leagues to figure out what a player was thinking? I'm not aware of any reliable way to do that. If there's no reliable way to make something happen, you can't base your processes off it.
If a league is willing to let referees have the benefit of the doubt re: "intent to whistle" every game, I think it's only fair, on a case by case basis such as these rare instances, that a guy gets the same benefit.

I don't know Beckman or follow the Isles but think they could at least extend him some consideration.
 
damn-1.gif
 
In position or out of position. He tried to. Beckman changed his path and the ref even puts his arm out. Beckman gave 0 f's.
This was clearly unintentional. Punishment does not fit the crime.

But it is interesting how easily a person can go down when contact is made on a slippery surface. Makes you wonder about some of the "diving" calls refs add to a legit penalty.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad