Kegs
Registered User
- Nov 10, 2010
- 3,872
- 6,410
I wish this happened.Imagine if the linesmen skated over and jumped Beckman like players do when an opponent puts a big hit on their star player. Lol
I wish this happened.Imagine if the linesmen skated over and jumped Beckman like players do when an opponent puts a big hit on their star player. Lol
I dunno. If he pushed a player with out the puck like that it would be an interference penalty for sure.So then they shouldn't be suspending a guy for shoving a ref in a spot on the ice where he would be completely within his rights top shove an opponent. The ref shouldn't have been there, Beckman had no reason to expect a ref to be right in his way. He's focused on the puck.
If he gets to NYI, he'll start to think his opponents are his teammates and turn the puck over like the rest of the Isles do on a chronic basisHe clearly thought the ref was an opposing defenseman but I hope Florida gets him, he'd fit right in.
I think the difference is that an opposing player would be expecting contact, and be far more prepared for it. That type of shove happens every 5 seconds when there's a puck battle in the corners. It's a nothing play.I dunno. If he pushed a player with out the puck like that it would be an interference penalty for sure.
Sounds like something that would happen in the video game Tape to Tape.Imagine if the linesmen skated over and jumped Beckman like players do when an opponent puts a big hit on their star player. Lol
If he has no situational awareness and couldnt figure out that was a referee, then maybe hockey isnt for him…He obviously thought it was an opponent and not the ref since he was in his periphery and no one would expect a professional referee to be that out of position and in the way.
So then they shouldn't be suspending a guy for shoving a ref in a spot on the ice where he would be completely within his rights top shove an opponent. The ref shouldn't have been there, Beckman had no reason to expect a ref to be right in his way. He's focused on the puck.
For those who don't know Beckman, he is a very nice guy, and, unfortunately for his career, plays with low levels of physicality. He got in a fight in training camp against a non fighter to try to impress Guerin, and got his ass completely kicked.
Tall'ish, thin, good shot.
I understand where you're coming from, but punishing a player for abuse of official should absolutely require the league to determine Beckman's intent, at least as best as they can. The Wideman incident is completely different in that Wideman had plenty of time to see stripes, he had a reason to be upset, and his reaction after the hit seemed to suggest there was nothing accidental about it.They’ll probably talk to Beckman about his positioning — not that they really need to point it out after this happened as a result. I doubt anyone believes Beckman targeted the ref.
But much like the Wideman incident where he was probably concussed and lost in space, the league can’t give the benefit of the doubt when it comes to laying a full-blown check on a ref. That’s a door they just can’t open.
You are still responsible for your actions.So then they shouldn't be suspending a guy for shoving a ref in a spot on the ice where he would be completely within his rights top shove an opponent. The ref shouldn't have been there, Beckman had no reason to expect a ref to be right in his way. He's focused on the puck.
He really wasnt “that out position” the players are both coming down on him, each going a different side. There was no “safe spot” to go to. The player is the moron who couldnt avoid him while clearly seeing him. Referees are in that spot 500x a game, hence while he received a 10 game suspension. I’m sure he’ll some better on ice awareness when he returns next season.If you have played hockey and can get past the headline, into the context that (like several have noted) the ref was extremely out of position, I can see how this play unfolded. No malicious intent imo.
But, gotta protect refs. Actions, consequences, all that jazz.
Seems reasonable all around assuming the ref is maybe questioned and has his positioning skills reviewed too.
I can certainly understand where you're coming from, especially since I've watched Beckman a good amount and he's not a dirty guy, but how do you expect leagues to figure out what a player was thinking? I'm not aware of any reliable way to do that. If there's no reliable way to make something happen, you can't base your processes off it.I understand where you're coming from, but punishing a player for abuse of official should absolutely require the league to determine Beckman's intent, at least as best as they can. The Wideman incident is completely different in that Wideman had plenty of time to see stripes, he had a reason to be upset, and his reaction after the hit seemed to suggest there was nothing accidental about it.
Or maybe it was in his periphery and he was reacting at game speed?If he has no situational awareness and couldnt figure out that was a referee, then maybe hockey isnt for him…
Yea the next time the ref should just fly out of the way. Shame on him.Or maybe it was in his periphery and he was reacting at game speed?
Could say that if the ref is that incompetent and that in the way, maybe hockey isn't for him.
Yes, because there was no proactive decision he could have made to not put himself directly in the middle of the playYea the next time the ref should just fly out of the way. Shame on him.
I wonder if you’ve ever played hockey, going to assume not.Yes, because there was no proactive decision he could have made to not put himself directly in the middle of the play
That's the response of someone without an argument, let's try again. I've already said it's a fair suspension since the league shouldn't be in the business of trying to discern player intent.I wonder if you’ve ever played hockey, going to assume not.