Drew75
Registered User
- Sep 5, 2005
- 2,518
- 0
Glass half full verses half empty when defining "best position".
Major holes in the lineup, with NO significant pieces to re-sign pointing to lack of assets above the missing pieces/holes already existing
Is that really "best position", as opposed to teams in the opposite position without holes and players deserving of investing financial resources on as far as team competitiveness and future goes? Perhaps you meant "bleak position" ahead.![]()
I think Nonis is in a very unenviable position personally, as this current roster is heading for a reset button in making, with limited current talent, a roster missing major pieces and 1/2 the roster coming off the books next year with limited internal pieces to fill those gaping holes. Combine that with MLSE expectations for playoffs sooner than later based on their decision of promoting Nonis to right the ship in short order. So Nonis has no honeymoon period either to allow for much wiggle room before success is expected.
Toss more fuel on the fire and Nonis has to sell prized UFA players to join the Leafs a struggling team in midst of a rebuild without a playoff day to its name in a decade, coming out of a major fire sale as you suggest to boot. If UFA signing is the solution the new CBA which just neutered Leafs spending ability even more by lowering the cap and most importantly limiting contract lengths and $$ spent, allowing more teams to pursue UFA players on equal financial terms making the laws of supply and demand increased odds against of success of landing one. With money being equal to UFAs and Cup competitiveness no where in sight in Toronto to lure free agents its going to be a real tough sell for Nonis.
I agree Nonis finds himself heading into the eye of the hurricane as the perfect storm is forming right before his own eyes, but unlike you I don't see him looking forward to it.
Your post actually made me laugh a bit - you are the biggest proponent of "play the kids", "make room for the kids", etc, etc ... and now you are pointing out the flaws of what you've been selling.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/495f1/495f185fc1f2d2bd459ec9ded3ca2eb67b513d95" alt="laugh :laugh: :laugh:"
I'm not actually talking about tanking, nor long term losing ... I'm talking about marginal improvement, about not going for a guy like Lou who will put you in the playoffs when your team isn't ready for it. Moving Lombardi and Connelly for 2nd / 3rd round picks is not going to drastically impact the Leafs in a negative way. We have a couple of kids ready to replace a guy like MacAurther or Steckle. It's status quo - showing some natural improvement based on player development.
Do we have holes? Sure - no one is saying otherwise. Having guys like Kessel, Gardiner, Reilly, Kulemin (who will rebound), Kadri, Van Reims, Frattin, and Gunnarson does give us a foundation. Add a 10th overall and 20th overall pick from next June, along with 2 or 3 2nd rounders, and the foundation gets stronger. Add a solid prospect or two stolen by helping other teams get under the cap, and we may enter July in a position of promise - a young, exciting team on the rise.
Toronto is still Toronto - the "Vatican of Hockey" as an interesting man once stated. A young team on the rise in the bigest hockey market in the world, along with some financial might just be enough to grab a top free agent or two in the summer.
What I was pointing to is that are not just one, but many factors that appear to be primed in order to launch the Leafs to that next level - IF they play cards right. Will they? Who knows? (besides, of course, the many "self proclaimed" experts on these boards who are convinced nothing will EVER go the Leafs way, regardless who is running the ship). I don't know ... but I do see that the opportunity is there.