The rebuild is done, imo. Not because of our current winning streaks but I knew we were done the moment we drafted Demidov and Hage. Even more now after seeing what Hutson, Dobes, Heineman can do. We don't need another high draft pick, just gotta get the young guys get some NHL experience. There'll be some growing pains for sure but it's all part of the process.
There is still too much uncertainty, IMO, to declare that the rebuild is done because the sample size for Dobes is too small and Heinemann still needs to continue progressing into a more complete player.
Regarding Demidov and, especially, Hage, there is zero sample size right now. Admittedly, Demidov appears to be a special player, but Hage,s path to the NHL iand eventual impact is less certain.
Hutson's performance, both offensively (wow) and defensively is a blessing for a 62nd OA pick at the draft, but expecting Montreal to nab such gens again is far from guaranteed.
If ending the rebuild means having enough players to soon become a playoff team, sure, but if it means becoming a perennial Cup contender, no.
Reinbacher should become a top-4 RHD, but he might not be a legitimate, all around, first pairing RHD?
Having Carrier as a structural addition to play in the top-4 with Guhle is fine, to stabilize the D-Corps, but not the quality RHD we actually need to form one of the better D-Corps in the league.
It's unclear whether we could ice a shutdown pair of Guhle-Reinbacher as half of our top-4 and have an easier time finding a mobile shutdown defenseman as the option to play with Hutson, that being enough because Hutson controls the play on his own?
So, we are definitely missing a RHD still, provided Reinbacher pans out. It's just the quality of that RHD that needs to be determined.
Up front, there are no guarantees that each will round out as a top-6 C because, despite the flashes of dominance, he has, to date in his career, failed to avoid injury and, while;e healthy, failed to display consistency required to be the solution at that position.
If we can sign laine to an extension at the right price, we are that much closer to closing out our top-6. Laine can serve to add the option of signing an UFA in the prime of his career in the form of Ehlers, for example, even if that would shock fans and demote Slafkovsky to a 3rd line role.
Signing an UFA like Ehlers would cost zero in terms of assets other than Cap space and he is peaking at the right time. Besides, there is already a prior chemistry and friendship with Laine.
Assets saved -- namely futures like our two first round picks -- could be used to acquire more skilled depth for the bottom 6, players capable of playing up in the lineup in case of injuries.
Packaging a combination of our first round picks (adding an extra one, maybe, by trading Evans at the trade deadline) could serve to move up at the 2025 draft, perhaps targeting a skilled physical pest like Carter Bear, who can bring a net front presence, or a two-way C with 2nd line upside and a physical game in Caleb Desnoyers (who needs to fill out at 179 lbs, but who also stands tall enough at 6'2").
In three years:
Ehlers - Suzuki - Laine
Caufield - Dach - Demidov
Slafkovsky - Desnoyers/Hage - Hage/Bear
Heineman - Beck - Davidson/F.Xhekaj