DitchMarner
What's The Definition of Impressive?
I know a Rielly thread exists; I want this thread to be used for a specific topic as opposed to serving as a general discussion thread about a player.
I am drawing parallels between Morgan and the defensemen mentioned in the title.
They all had seasons/stretches of very good play but were prone to mental lapses and had defensive shortcomings that really kept any of them from being an ideal number one defenseman, let alone an elite one (ala prime Doughty, Keith, etc).
I personally liked both McCabe and Gardiner (didn't care for Dion), but they were hard to defend at times. All of them were basically whipping boys who were more or less run out of town.
It seems to me that to a considerable extent Rielly has been spared the level of scrutiny to which the aforementioned defensemen were often subjected... although it seems that he is being criticized more often and more severely as of late.
I think it's fair to say that it is disappointing that a defenseman who should be in his prime has really not progressed at all on the defensive side of things years into his career. Now that there is no longer a Gardiner to pick on, maybe his shortcomings are becoming harder to ignore. I personally have become somewhat disillusioned with Rielly lately.
In retrospect, maybe the Leafs should have sold high on McCabe after he racked up a ton of PP points in '06. After signing a new deal, he regressed and was traded away. Phaneuf never lived up to his last contract, either. Should these players be used as precedents when gauging Rielly's future value?
I am drawing parallels between Morgan and the defensemen mentioned in the title.
They all had seasons/stretches of very good play but were prone to mental lapses and had defensive shortcomings that really kept any of them from being an ideal number one defenseman, let alone an elite one (ala prime Doughty, Keith, etc).
I personally liked both McCabe and Gardiner (didn't care for Dion), but they were hard to defend at times. All of them were basically whipping boys who were more or less run out of town.
It seems to me that to a considerable extent Rielly has been spared the level of scrutiny to which the aforementioned defensemen were often subjected... although it seems that he is being criticized more often and more severely as of late.
I think it's fair to say that it is disappointing that a defenseman who should be in his prime has really not progressed at all on the defensive side of things years into his career. Now that there is no longer a Gardiner to pick on, maybe his shortcomings are becoming harder to ignore. I personally have become somewhat disillusioned with Rielly lately.
In retrospect, maybe the Leafs should have sold high on McCabe after he racked up a ton of PP points in '06. After signing a new deal, he regressed and was traded away. Phaneuf never lived up to his last contract, either. Should these players be used as precedents when gauging Rielly's future value?