Is Peter Forsberg underrated?

Has Forsberg become underrated?

  • Yes indeed

  • Maybe slightly

  • Not at all

  • He’s actually overrated


Results are only viewable after voting.

daver

Registered User
Apr 4, 2003
26,587
6,291
Visit site
Forsberg drew the top defensive pairings in the playoffs, not Sakic. I think that says it all.

Didn't Sakic draw the other team's #1 line? It was more of a 1A/1B situation unlike Crosby/Malkin or McDavid/Draisaitl where Malkin and Draisaitl face easier matchups.

Linemates can be a factor too but I don't think that's relevant as both Sakic and Forsberg had very good linemates throughout their shared prime.
 

Hallonbroder

Registered User
Nov 29, 2024
19
12
Didn't Sakic draw the other team's #1 line? It was more of a 1A/1B situation unlike Crosby/Malkin or McDavid/Draisaitl where Malkin and Draisaitl face easier matchups.

Linemates can be a factor too but I don't think that's relevant as both Sakic and Forsberg had very good linemates throughout their shared prime.
Nope, I’ve seen this brought up elsewhere and Forsberg was the focus for other teams 5v5. Also, didn’t Forsberg make guys like Gagne and Hejduk Rocket-contenders? Don’t know the stats for Sakic teammates really, but I let you and other fill me in on that
 

daver

Registered User
Apr 4, 2003
26,587
6,291
Visit site
Nope, I’ve seen this brought up elsewhere and Forsberg was the focus for other teams 5v5. Also, didn’t Forsberg make guys like Gagne and Hejduk Rocket-contenders? Don’t know the stats for Sakic teammates really, but I let you and other fill me in on that

In the face of this compelling evidence, I withdraw my comment.
 

daver

Registered User
Apr 4, 2003
26,587
6,291
Visit site
I mean, it’s been mentioned in avs and for example red wings forums before, but it would take a while to find.. Feels like you’re set in your mind though.

The general comment is that Forsberg faced the tougher defensive matchups while Sakic was matched up against the other team's #1 line.

I can buy a "healthy" Forsberg was slightly better than Sakic the same way that I can buy a "healthy, peak" Malkin was as good as Crosby but that you need to qualify a comparison with "healthy" is too much to ignore.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pablo El Perro

Ben White

Registered User
Dec 28, 2015
4,642
1,651
I’d rather just look at peak than best. Best ability is far too subjective to have any importance to me. Theoretically they should have shown their best ability at their peak.
It does, best ability is basically what said player showed at his peak and consistent enough to not be considered a bot streak. It’s just that “highest ability” disqualifies all those stupid arguments which confuses best peak with best peak seasons and what not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: authentic

daver

Registered User
Apr 4, 2003
26,587
6,291
Visit site
It does, best ability is basically what said player showed at his peak and consistent enough to not be considered a bot streak. It’s just that “highest ability” disqualifies all those stupid arguments which confuses best peak with best peak seasons and what not.

You may want to look at this thread which tries to identify the absolute best stretches of hockey since the Wayne/Mario era.

 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad