ted2019
History of Hockey
He has 1 cup and 306 wins and His GAA is 2.68 with 41 SO, but He's basically a .500 goalie for His career. Does He have a shot ?
Last edited by a moderator:
Will always be considered a very good goalie but never once has been great. And looking back on his career it's always been very good, not great. He's talented, not great. You get the picture. But he does have one threshold almost a must for goalies seeking the HHOF: A Cup. He played very well for Tampa in 2004. But this is the one thing I don't like about him. Twice in his career he has left teams that were on the cusp of something great (Tampa and Chicago). Both times he's gone to far inferior teams for a paycheque. Yes he won the Cup and THEN left with Tampa but I thought with a goalie they were good enough to win again. That's always bugged me about Khabby. So in closing, no he won't be in the HHOF
I don't know that it has anything to do with his legacy as a great goalie. But like you said, he's not good enough.
It doesn't really but I'm more thinking along the lines of "what if" when it comes to him. Would we look at him a little different if he was on Tampa for two Cups and played just as good in the second one as the first? Then perhaps he is still on Chicago now with their high Cup hopes. Maybe he gets the "championship" label or "winner" label stuck on him which alone would propel him into HHOF discussion (kind of what people might think of Osgood now).
Like Osgood I don't think that would still get him into the HHOF, but imagine if he won a pair of Cups on Tampa, and is currently on Chicago and that scary stacked team. It certainly wouldn't be crazy to project a HHOF future then
Tampa Bay needed to shed people for the salary cap and Tortorella seemed to have this thing for Grahame at the time. As for Chicago, they had no room for him under the salary cap either. They were committed to Huet. One can blame Khabibulin for his difficulties that caused the Hawks to get Huet
Khabibulin is better than Barrasso
Khabibulin is better than Barrasso and his stats are better than Joseph's and unlike Joseph he won a Stanley Cup, which is what seems to matter so much and is why someone like Fuhr is there. His numbers are similar to Kolzig's only that Kolzig never won that cup either. He is better than the overrated Vernon and his numbers are better than Richter's.
Some impute bad motives for his movements but he had no choice in the matter for the cases cited. Tampa Bay needed to shed people for the salary cap and Tortorella seemed to have this thing for Grahame at the time. As for Chicago, they had no room for him under the salary cap either. They were committed to Huet. One can blame Khabibulin for his difficulties that caused the Hawks to get Huet, but this suggestion that he's a money-grabbing Russian and that's why he should be condemned I think is unfair. I also notice that there is impatience for recent American goalies of note to be acknowledged (Richter, Barrasso in particular).
I'd love to hear how Khabibulin is better than Barrasso. Or what he's done that Joseph hasn't, aside from the cup.
????
Khabibulin: 1 cup, no major awards, 299 wins
Barrasso: 2 cups, Calder winner, Vezina winner, Jennings winner, 369 wins.
Yup, Habby is better.