Is mcdavid too good not to win a cup?

Don't know it was Sid's demand or not, but pretending that Sid didn't need help from Malkin is a lie. In fact Malkin helped even more %-wise.
PO 2009
Malkin factored in 12 points out of 31 = 38.7%
PO 2024
Drai factored in 16 points out of 42 =38.1%

Entire premise that Sid is somehow helping his team is a media hype. PIT plays better w/o him. PIT would win 3 cups w/o him easily.
My post was obviously about 2017 and especially 2016.

I know that Crosby & Malkin were capable to carry 2009 Pens together to the Cup with not much help but McDrai obviously can’t, so there is a other way to win a cup presented
 
Who is Pittburgh's Hyman, Kane or Nuge in 2009?

And Pittsburgh maybe has four Cups if they faced any other team than the 2008 Wings.
Pittsburgh arguably would've been the DE FACTO team of the 2010s if injuries didn't heavily play a factor and Fleury wasn't so dogshit.

You also pair that with a healthy Prime Sid and Malkin and I can comfortably say they win the cup in 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2018, 2022. Yeah hockey's a luck based game with certain nuances playing a factor at certain moments but the Pens team from 08-22 greatly underachieved and I'll die on that hill. f*** INJURIES
 
Last edited:
It's a major pet peeve of mine when people put the onus of a Cup on one player or use it when discussing individual achievements.

I get it. It's nice to see great players win a Cup. But hockey remains a team sport.
thats what a lot of people in here fail to realize. Its a TEAM sport. Also they say its the hardest trophy to win in sports for a reason. I understand Skinner is shitty. #1 goalies dont exactly grow on trees lately. Not everyone gets to draft a Shesterkin Vasy type of goalie and teams dont have spare #1's to trade for.
 
It's a major pet peeve of mine when people put the onus of a Cup on one player or use it when discussing individual achievements.

I get it. It's nice to see great players win a Cup. But hockey remains a team sport.
The fact that some Avs fans in here, some of whom are presumably old enough to remember Ray Bourque lifting the cup in his last game before retiring after 22 seasons, pretend that they are unaware that it's entirely possible for a generational player to just not win it is a bit silly, IMO.

I think it's entirely possible that McDavid with the Oilers never get as close to winning the cup as he was last year.
 
Pittsburgh arguably would've been the DE FACTO team of the 2010s if injuries didn't heavily play a factor and Fleury wasn't so dogshit.

You also paired that with a healthy Prime Sid and Malkin and I can comfortably say they win the cup in 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2018, 2022. Yeah hockey's a luck based game with certain nuances playing a factor at certain moments but the Pens team from 08-22 greatly underachieved and I'll die on that hill. f*** INJURIES
The bolded could pretty easily describe the Oilers the last 3 seasons
 
Not with that defense and goaltender they don't. McDavid could have Barkov level defensive capabilities and they'd still be hooped because of that back end.
I quite literally posted proof of having Barkov's jock on would have won game 1 for the Oilers. But if your two top centers play zero D, any defense will get caved in. Theyve chosen as a team to go top heavy with offense, now they have to live with those decisions and this entire thread is selling McDavid on why he should leave next offseason.
 
I quite literally posted proof of having Barkov's jock on would have won game 1 for the Oilers. But if your two top centers play zero D, any defense will get caved in. Theyve chosen as a team to go top heavy with offense, now they have to live with those decisions and this entire thread is selling McDavid on why he should leave next offseason.
Yes, you posted what you think.
 
Do you disagree? Or does anyone? Its pretty objective via footage to say yay or nay to good defense.
I agree that in hindsight if McDavid had made different defensive reads game 1 they could have won. I do not think they would win game 2 since McDavid wasn't even on the ice for enough goals against to make a difference to the outcome. I also think that making defensive adjustments as an individual player to win against LA is one thing, but to win the Cup is something that requires a full team of hard working and smart (not necessarily talented) players, paired with clutch goaltending, which the Oilers don't have.
 
My personal analysis about McDavid and Drai - Versus Sid And Geno in their prime. There was no drop off level wise, skill wise, dominance wise between Sid and Geno. And because they didn't play often with each other made it difficult for teams to know which line to shut down. Also they had two different points of attack in terms of how either one approach the game specially in 2009. Example, if you shut down Line 1, well line two was as much of a problem and you through your best guys to shut down line 1. Left line to two feast. If you decide to shut down line 2 well line 1 came to dinner and eat the opponents up. This is the biggest difference between Prime Sid and Geno, and current McDavid and Drai.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sanscosm
So McDavid is the problem in Edmonton? Hmmm.
No one is saying that, but maybe give up a few goals for and focus on the goals against could do some wonders in EDM.

I agree that in hindsight if McDavid had made different defensive reads game 1 they could have won. I do not think they would win game 2 since McDavid wasn't even on the ice for enough goals against to make a difference to the outcome. I also think that making defensive adjustments as an individual player to win against LA is one thing, but to win the Cup is something that requires a full team of hard working and smart (not necessarily talented) players, paired with clutch goaltending, which the Oilers don't have.
I didnt watch game 2 sadly. Was watching the Avs shit the bed, but youre onto something. As a team, theyve committed to funnel everything through McDaris, win or lose. Changing the whole team mentality to commit to defense first and win 2-1 games instead of 6-5 could be what they need.
 
Changing the whole team mentality to commit to defense first and win 2-1 games instead of 6-5 could be what they need.

They did this last year when they split up McDavid and Draisaitl starting in the Dallas series. Draisaitl was injured and went from a 2.00 PPG thru 2 rounds to a 0.54 PPG the rest of the way. It forced them to play tighter hockey and they almost won the Cup.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sanscosm
They did this last year when they split up McDavid and Draisaitl starting in the Dallas series. Draisaitl was injured and went from a 2.00 PPG thru 2 rounds to a 0.54 PPG the rest of the way. It forced them to play tighter hockey and they almost won the Cup.
This is true, but this year's team looks slow, has had about 10 different injuries in the past 2 months, and is missing their best Dman. Not to mention Kane hasn't played in a year and is coming off a complicated surgery, and Frederic looks like he can't skate and will likely not be back up to game form until next season.

I'm not sure the current roster is even capable of doing what last year's roster did defensively even if they wanted to because half the guys look slow either due to age or injury, and they're missing their 25-30minute 2-way beast on the backend.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad