Clearly McDavid motivates his teammates. Are the Oilers full of great players or are they McDavid + Draisatle and a whole lot of average guys? Imo McDavid sure does a damn good job of motivating those average guys to be a lot better than they actually are.Merely noting that this exact thread came up about five years ago.
Would suggest that whether McDavid is a good captain isn't the right question, but it is whether McDavid is a good leader, which isn't exactly the same.
As was related repeatedly in the earlier thread, the problem with this inquiry is that the only persons who could really answer this question are his current or former teammates, and they are not participants in these HF discussions. Nobody but them knows what goes on during practices, in the locker room, the in-game chatter, or what is said or not said at the steakhouse after the game.
About the only thing that can reasonably be discussed is whether McDavid's efforts towards leadership manifests itself on the ice. Otherwise stated, does it seem or not seem that McDavid motivates his teammates to elevate their on-ice play, other than the raw application of his own natural talents? But even that seems pretty speculative one way or the other.
Perhaps a more worthwhile discussion is how McDavid compares in this regard to Matthew Tkachuk who is obviously a leader (if Matthew Tkachuk isn't a leader then that term has no meaning with the NHL).
Agree. It would tax reality to suggest that a team which got to the SCF two years in a row suffered from poor leadership. The question then becomes how McDavid's leadership should be rated, but that is both highly speculative and highly subjective.Clearly McDavid motivates his teammates. Are the Oilers full of great players or are they McDavid + Draisatle and a whole lot of average guys? Imo McDavid sure does a damn good job of motivating those average guys to be a lot better than they actually are.
Shorthanded points indicating the guy is playing with the puck in the opponents end in a 4v5 situation? Where is the stats that back up Crosbys defensive prowess because McDavid blows him out at pretty much everything except faceoffs. So other than narrative what do you have to actually back it up? +/- takeaways penalty killing all favor McDavid heavily if we measure Crosby for what he did by the same years of playing time as McDavid who dominates his opponents much harder.Are you unaware of the irony of praising a player's defense by listing their point totals?
This is just a rudimentary view of the sport. There are many reasons why this could be. Playing in the opponents' end is generally not one of them, most shorthanded goals are scored off the rush, not from a cycle while down a man.Shorthanded points indicating the guy is playing with the puck in the opponents end in a 4v5 situation? Where is the stats that back up Crosbys defensive prowess because McDavid blows him out at pretty much everything except faceoffs. So other than narrative what do you have to actually back it up? +/- takeaways penalty killing all favor McDavid heavily if we measure Crosby for what he did by the same years of playing time as McDavid who dominates his opponents much harder.
His biggest problem is that Draisaitl is no Kane. Draisaitl absolutely needs McDavid to carry him while Kane never really needed Toews.Phenomenal hockey player
Absolutely zero leadership skills or intangibles. The anti Jonathan Toews.
Ok but where is the argument FOR Crosby....didn't he literally get outscored head to head against Zetterberg in his very first finals? What's so complete about that? Am I missing something or isnt that straight up losing your head to head and having the rest of the team win for you which is a luxury McDavid clearly doesnt have. Like where is the more "complete" player. This isnt even taking into account McDavid dancing around both Ekblad and Barkov like they were a joke on one play to get shutdown by Bob who was amazing pretty much all series and then watching Marchand go around your team like beer leaguers when you step off the ice and have your goalie give up a goal on any quality chances.This is just a rudimentary view of the sport. There are many reasons why this could be. Playing in the opponents' end is generally not one of them, most shorthanded goals are scored off the rush, not from a cycle while down a man.
I'm not saying this is the case for McDavid, but a player making risky plays to steal the puck could increase his offensive opportunities shorthanded, yet still be a detriment overall every time he pulled himself out of position.
By your logic Gretzky was the best penalty killer ever.
McDavid is barely above 50% GF% in his playoff career at 5v5 without Draisaitl on the ice.Ok but where is the argument FOR Crosby....didn't he literally get outscored head to head against Zetterberg in his very first finals? What's so complete about that? Am I missing something or isnt that straight up losing your head to head and having the rest of the team win for you which is a luxury McDavid clearly doesnt have. Like where is the more "complete" player. This isnt even taking into account McDavid dancing around both Ekblad and Barkov like they were a joke on one play to get shutdown by Bob who was amazing pretty much all series and then watching Marchand go around your team like beer leaguers when you step off the ice and have your goalie give up a goal on any quality chances.
Im pretty sure most metrics actually backup McDavid being an all around player as well.
Thanks for putting this together so quickly. There should be little doubt that McDavid and Draisaitl are all-time great playoff performers (Cup or not).
That being said, is it possible that their results are inflated because the Oilers play run-and-gun hockey (so there are lots of lead changes)? As I mentioned earlier in the thread, it seems likely that players from that type of team will have more opportunities to generate lots of WPA. (On the other hand, I'm not sure if this should be held against them. If Skinner keeps allowing bad goals, they should get credit for going out...
With Skinner, definitely not. With Bobrovsky, almost without questionBarkov couldn’t lead the Oilers to a Cup.
Nope. Bobrovsky would’ve crashed out in Edmonton.With Skinner, definitely not. With Bobrovsky, almost without question
And I suppose Florida would’ve won back to back cups and made 3 finals appearances in a row with Skinner as well.Nope. Bobrovsky would’ve crashed out in Edmonton.
Probably. I don’t think Bob was honestly even all that good in the Finals this year.And I suppose Florida would’ve won back to back cups and made 3 finals appearances in a row with Skinner as well.
Draisaitl is at ~120 point pace without McDavid, albeit with a small sample size.His biggest problem is that Draisaitl is no Kane. Draisaitl absolutely needs McDavid to carry him while Kane never really needed Toews.
Draisaitl needs McDavid to drive the play to get him open because he cannot do it by himself. It’s so clear when anyone watches him.
weird cause Draisaitl outscored McDavid this year...just like 2019-20His biggest problem is that Draisaitl is no Kane. Draisaitl absolutely needs McDavid to carry him while Kane never really needed Toews.
Draisaitl needs McDavid to drive the play to get him open because he cannot do it by himself. It’s so clear when anyone watches him.
But what came first, the chicken or the egg? Do great captains win cups or do captains become great after winning cups?I'm honestly really curious to see where this poll ends up.
The "right f***ing now" speech from last year's finals I thought was incredibly cringe, and I could not believe what I saw tonight with him just abandoning the center of the ice as the late forward so he could double up on the puck carrier on that second goal against tonight (????). And yet, he's offensively one of the best players to ever play the game.
Anyway I'm not sure if he's a 'poor' captain, but it seems like the best Captains (ie Messier, Scott Stevens, Sakic, Yzerman, Bergeron etc) all seem to end up winning at some point. And then there are also extremely gifted players like Jumbo or Bure who never do.
Thanks for the thread OP, curious to see where this vote ends up
0-2 in Stanley Cup finals. By that point Crosby was 1-1 but Crosby was anything but clutch when they won their first cup. In fact, he was less clutch than McDavid. But he was definitely clutch in 2010, just like McDavid was clutch at the four nations.When Sid retires, McChoker better not be gifted the “C” for Team Canada
Overrated anti-clutch loser.