But why is the focus only on the next best teammate instead of the other players on that team? The Oilers have turned into a team that’s pretty good at locking things down, but their high end offense is still heavily dependent on their two-headed monster. They can still be good with only one, but they’re not an elite team without both.
Also, I feel like too many are looking at it in the context of McDavid being the overall better player rather than viewing things through the lens of this season. There’s a number of comments about how “if Draisaitl was gone they’d still have McDavid”, but that assumes McDavid is going to take it up a notch over how he’s played. Yea their point per games are the same, but McDavid did miss those games. And even beyond the points, Draisaitl is the much better goal scorer this year, is playing the better all around game and has worse linemates when they’re apart.
It’s mostly noise, but McDavid has actually been outscored when on the ice 5v5 without Draisaitl (46% GF%), while Draisaitl is at 57% without McDavid. Overall, Draisaitl has a 60% GF% at 5v5, while the Oilers are just under 50% with him off the ice. He’s also factored into 46% of his team’s goals, which is slightly more than MacKinnon for most in the league. The focus for Draisaitl’s Hart bid has been more about his case for the best player this year, but I think he’s being underrated in terms of relative value.