GIN ANTONIC
Registered User
I think it's a top down problem for the most part. Ownership groups in Canada run their organizations more as old boys club it would seem. Not that the rest of the league is terribly open to new ideas and fresh faces but you see it a lot more often. It feels like for most Canadian teams the hires for President of Hockey Ops, then GM, AGM and Head coach have to be more of a name brand because they are selling to fans and media that are going to be more critical so nothing can be too outside of the box. Dubas is probably one of the only outliers here and well, he was an idiot in disguise.
The other issue I see is an accountability self preservation thing. Coaches, GMs, get far too much rope when they underperform because firing them would be an indictment on the boss who hired them. There's no good reason why Shanahan should still have a job. Rutherford is a complete merchant of chaos.
Basically for the most part I think it's dumb people making dumb decisions.
The other issue I see is an accountability self preservation thing. Coaches, GMs, get far too much rope when they underperform because firing them would be an indictment on the boss who hired them. There's no good reason why Shanahan should still have a job. Rutherford is a complete merchant of chaos.
Basically for the most part I think it's dumb people making dumb decisions.