Maple Leaf
VIP
- Sep 18, 2009
- 10,190
- 5,423
I’M GENIUS, according to ME
When we acquired him, everyone was talking about him being a quality top 4 dman, and a big upgrade over Sandin. I just do not see it, on either front.
I like his physical edge, but that’s about it. IMO he’s our worst defensive dman (yes, including Klingberg), terrible gap control and constantly caught out of position. Not much in the way of puck skills either. He was decent against Tampa, but Florida were absolutely hunting him to great success, and so far this year he’s been a complete sieve.
Are other people seeing this? Or do others like his game, see him as a legit top 4 dman, and it’s just me? He looks like a mediocre 6D to me.
Fred Boimistruck and Jim Benny say hi......of course that was the team's fault for throwing them to the wolves.............Nothing will ever compare to how hyped Mike Komisarek was and how bad he turned out to be
the goal tending is a thread worthy concern of it's own imo...........I'm not willing to blame the defense until either
A one of these goalies puts up a 900 save%
B allows less than 3 goals and steals a game.
Woll wasn't terrible last night but Samsonov owes this team 2 games
Leafs don't need cheap D men, they need D men that can defend. That can't happen while 4 forwards take half the cap. It's groundhog day yet again.............He's paid like a bottom tiered defenseman. Relax, not all of them are top level defense. Especially this team, Brad has flipped our depth. We now have most of our better players up front. He does need to make a move on the blue line, no question. Are you missing Holl?
I figured I should take a better look at his games - not just in realtime while watching, but breaking down video on replays, see if the chances were really his fault or not. Here's my assessment of every strong scoring chance against that happened while McCabe was on the ice, against Chicago (he was on for most of the strong scoring chances against):
1) McCabe bobbles the bouncing puck, doesn't position his body to block it either, allows strong scoring chance, is lucky that Woll bails him out. His high level positioning is good, but the details/hands aren't, in a high danger area like this you want to get your body in the way so it blocks the puck if you miss it with your stick
2) Combination of errors on this one. Bad point pass by Gregor, then a bad decision by Klingberg (should've backed off and allowed the zone exit vs. trying to hold the line flat-footed). I think those 2 are mostly at fault, but also don't love McCabe's transition D, does end up caught in no-man's lang a bit. McCabe "meh" but not terrible, Gregor and Klingberg more at fault, although at least Gregor makes a great backcheck to limit the danger of the scoring chance
3) Similar to the last play - McCabe not terrible, but not great either. Bedard beat Klingberg clean off the rush, McCabe defends sort of OK, but not great - he ends up in no-man's land a bit, not really covering Bedard or effectively taking away the pass to Donato. I think this is mostly on Klingberg, but McCabe is at best average here, more like below average. Would also like to see McCabe stop in front of the net here, vs. skating himself out of the play - he would have been in terrible position if there was a fast rebound chance.
4) Pretty bad here IMO, just too big gaps all over the place, too passive and slow to apply pressure a few plays in a row, ending up in a goal against. Though I will say, Klingberg puts him in tough spots again - puts him in positions where he has to be super on the ball with his gaps and pressure just to do OK, and he isn't. This is an issue I see often with McCabe - he's not often badly out of position, but he is often just a step behind the play, struggling to keep up and not applying meaningful pressure
5) McCabe strongly at fault IMO, Lily is in good position to defend the puck carrier (Athanasiou), and the pass to Johnson is the clear biggest danger. There's a number of Blackhawks sort of on the rush, but only Athanasiou and Johnson have the speed and positioning to be immediately dangerous, if the puck goes to anyone else other Leafs will have time to recover and join the defensive effort. It's clear the right play for McCabe here is to cover Johnson, but instead he doubles Athanasiou, leaving the pass to Johnson wide open. Then he's too slow to recover, goal against. I think this is the only goal against that Lily has been on for this season?
These chances/goals are certainly not all McCabe's fault, Klingberg especially is putting him in bad positions frequently. This made me revisit my thinking that McCabe is worse than Klingberg defensively - I think Klingberg is worse than McCabe on these plays, he's often the root of the problem while McCabe is more often the secondary issue. Will have to keep looking out for this, it's probably a pattern.
However, McCabe does still look pretty bad on these IMO, especially since he's not an offensive guy like Klingberg, if he contributes anywhere it's defensively. This is maybe a below average McCabe game, but not way below average or anything - IMO he has looked similar throughout the Florida series, and through 3 games so far this year.
Overall, breaking these plays down makes me think we should split up McCabe and Klingberg, maybe McCabe would have more success with Lily, but still not liking McCabe's game. It's not encouraging that Gio/Lily have been rock solid together, but in a very rare time where McCabe was paired with Lily, it was an instant goal against that was primarily McCabe's fault.
Not ever gonna win a cup with this d fenceHonestly, I haven't been overly impressed with any dmen.
I think youre overrating value of a late 1st pick...Doesn’t matter what he’s being paid when a 1st rounder was used to get him. Only the Foligno for a 1st was worse. That still makes me lol.
Dubas might!I think youre overrating value of a late 1st pick...
NOBODY will gulive a top 3 D with term retained at 50% for a late 1st ...absolutly nobody.
Leafs dont have any cap space, so they need to find quality player at low price ...
I've probably been the most critical of McCabe but he looked passable playing with Liljegren last night, meaning Keefe will probably split them up asapMcCabe - Liljegren will do fine IMO.
Even though McCabe is more of a defensive defenceman, he still needs someone that’s pretty strong defensively for when he does boneheaded moves and jumps into the offence aka why pairing him with Klingberg does not work.I've probably been the most critical of McCabe but he looked passable playing with Liljegren last night, meaning Keefe will probably split them up asap
Rielly has looked pretty good. I think with Klingberg in the picture for the offensive role it has allowed Rielly to focus on both ends of the ice and taken some pressure off from producing offensively. But like you said it’s shown that we do need that top pairing dman more than ever now.I've liked Rielly this year but it feels like we need to add an upper echelon defenseman. Schenn over Klingberg and just roll out Timmins or something.
Since that didn't happen, McCabe is a pretty average 2nd pairing defenseman that is not so great to counter how bad Klingberg is at defense.
I get what you are sayingHe's both, pretty bad and pretty good. Just like Rielly has always been forced to be a #1 when is better suited to be #2, next to a true star #1 dman. McCabe is forced to be a #3 he's better slotted as a #4. This defence is all slotted one position too high.
It might be that the #3 d-man averages more ice time and is looked at to "carry" that pairing?I get what you are saying
BUT
I never understood.
A number 3 D better slotted at 4.
What is the difference when he plays on the same pairing?
He would look much better on the third pair of we had a legit no.4 to go in his spot
I get what you are saying
BUT
I never understood.
A number 3 D better slotted at 4.
What is the difference when he plays on the same pairing?