Howe was a big strong monster who could overwhelm with power and skill. Same could be said for Richard (who could also skate like the wind).
Orr could skate circles around most of the league and had a huge clapper from the point.
Lemieux was mostly too big to handle and had a great shot and was one of the elite stickhandlers the league has seen.
Gretzky could not skate like Crosby.
He could not shoot and play physically like Ovie can.
He was not close to the player off the rush that Lafleur/Hull were who were both elite skaters/shooters (Lafleur was also a great passer).
Trying to pinpoint Gretzky's greatest strengths and you go to words like "vision" and "thinking the game" . He obviously had a great shot in terms of accuracy early in his career but never an elite power shot and of course he would become mostly a passer as his career went on.
Not only may there not be a comparative in hockey but I would argue he might be the most physically underwhelming player to become generational in ANY of the traditional big sports.
Orr could skate circles around most of the league and had a huge clapper from the point.
Lemieux was mostly too big to handle and had a great shot and was one of the elite stickhandlers the league has seen.
Gretzky could not skate like Crosby.
He could not shoot and play physically like Ovie can.
He was not close to the player off the rush that Lafleur/Hull were who were both elite skaters/shooters (Lafleur was also a great passer).
Trying to pinpoint Gretzky's greatest strengths and you go to words like "vision" and "thinking the game" . He obviously had a great shot in terms of accuracy early in his career but never an elite power shot and of course he would become mostly a passer as his career went on.
Not only may there not be a comparative in hockey but I would argue he might be the most physically underwhelming player to become generational in ANY of the traditional big sports.