Is Boeser for Real is He Good for 40 Again

  • We sincerely apologize for the extended downtime. Our hosting provider, XenForo Cloud, encountered a major issue with their backup system, which unfortunately resulted in the loss of some critical data from the past year.

    What This Means for You:

    • If you created an account after March 2024, it no longer exists. You will need to sign up again to access the forum.
    • If you registered before March 2024 but changed your email, username, or password in the past year, those changes were lost. You’ll need to update your account details manually once you're logged in.
    • Threads and posts created within the last year have been restored.

    Our team is working with Xenforo Cloud to recover data using backups, sitemaps, and other available resources. We know this is frustrating, and we deeply regret the impact on our community. We are taking steps with Xenforo Cloud to ensure this never happens again. This is work in progress. Thank you for your patience and support as we work through this.

    In the meantime, feel free to join our Discord Server
He has a very good shot but I prefer to judge players overall instead of breaking down subjective things like a wrist shot.

First thing I thought of is that Shane Wright has a really good wrist shot but so what, each player has to bring more than just their best trait to the table and then we view the overall package.

Lekkerimäki has a really good shot as well.

Perhaps someone else might chime in.
I tagged Regal as well, hopefully he gets the memo. Don't want to double tag the guy
 
I tagged Regal as well, hopefully he gets the memo. Don't want to double tag the guy
Just wondering why you are asking about just his wrist shot?

For goal scoring types the shot arsenal and release, heaviness, deception and accuracy are all important components.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Coffee
Just wondering why you are asking about just his wrist shot?

For goal scoring types the shot arsenal and release, heaviness, deception and accuracy are all important components.
Yeah may I rephrase my question to those standards and perhaps ask you again?

I messed up.
 
Yeah may I rephrase my question to those standards and perhaps ask you again?

I messed up.
I'll answer a different way.

I think the Canucks should move on from Brock because his contract won't be worth the value and I think Lekkerimäki with a little bit of increased strength and speed will be able to create more scoring opportunities for himself than Brock by this time in the 26-27 season, maybe sooner.

Brock could score 40 again if he signs as a FA with a good centerman to feed him and some top PP TOI but at this stage of his career he is more dependent on others and the injury history is there as well.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Coffee
I'll answer a different way.

I think the Canucks should move on from Brock because his contract won't be worth the value and I think Lekkerimäki with a little bit of increased strength and speed will be able to create more scoring opportunities for himself than Brock by this time in the 26-27 season, maybe sooner.

Brock could score 40 again if he signs as a FA with a good centerman to feed him and some top PP TOI but at thiss tage of his career he is more dependent on others and the injury history is there as well.
You should run for Mayor
 
  • Haha
Reactions: wetcoast

Ad

Ad