I always find it quite annoying when people reduce the Czech success of Nagano to just Hasek. Yes, Hasek was the best goalie around at that time, and I think he was pretty much responsible for the quarter final win against the US, I'll give you that. The Czechs won 4-1, but in the first period they played poorly and the US was far superior. Yet the US only scored once and led 1-0 after that period. Without Hasek the US would have put the game beyond the Czechs in the first 20 minutes.
But against Canada the Czechs were the better team. Hasek obviously contributed, but the team overall was better and Canada was extremely lucky to get to overtime. They scored a very flukey goal a minute and a bit before the end. The only game that was unbalanced in the whole tournament for the Czechs where the goalie really won it for them was against the US. The shots on goal reflected how good both America and Hasek were - 39-19 shots on goal for the Americans. Of course, the Czechs still had to score and they did it four times (no empty-netter), but Hasek was THE key. In the other games he performed brilliantly as well, but so did the whole team. Shots on goal in the semi final and final were completely balanced (the Czechs outshot Canada 31-30 and Russia 21-20, so basically even, and the stats reflected the balance of play between the teams). In round robin, they beat Finland 3-0 and outshot them 29-17, Kazakhstan 8-2 (45-23) and lost to Russia 1-2 (24-31). It was a fantastically put together team with Hasek being a key performer, but also very much part of a fantastic team set-up. The number of times Canadians have told me "your guys only beat us because of Hasek!". If an American said that to me, I can't disagree. But nobody from the countries of the other Czech opponents in Nagano.