Is 2025-2026 the worst eastern conference ever? | Page 15 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

Is 2025-2026 the worst eastern conference ever?

  • If you are having issues logging in, we have found opening the log in page in a new tab/window rather than using the pop out should resolve these issues. We are working to get this resolved and thank you for patience.
  • Congrats to our latest Sportsbook winners - GOLD MEDAL kihei, SILVER MEDAL fish7 and BRONZE MEDAL Sammy Kat - new tournament begins today 6/15
Yes, they caught a break facing Montreal and not TB in the ECF, but these things happen. Carolina are worthy champions, they've been knocking for years.
Eh, no. Tampa just got its first round exit for the fourth year in a row. This ain’t the 2020 squad and it’s time people admit that.

Maybe Buffalo would have squeezed out two wins because of their stylistic match up, but probably not. Montreal went 3-0 against the Canes, easily beat them in game 1 and proceeded to lose the next 2 in OT and the last two getting outscored what? 10-0 or something? I forgot.

When the entire league seemingly sucks, it just means one team is clearly better than the rest.
 
Nice try- the entire NHL was weak this year. Science can’t explain it.
Honestly the league just sucks right now there’s 3 teams I feel are cup level rosters in Carolina Edmonton and Minnesota. That’s basically it. Nobody else to me is close. We’ll have to see if it’s as bad next year or not. No Olympics will help to water it down less. I think someone else takes advantage next year and wins it who again won’t exactly be a juggernaut team.
 
Normally that type of playstyle is effective but has high requirements on the players' fitness levels and gets hard-countered by tough opponents over the grind of the playoffs. As a result, the Canes have historically tapered-off right around the Eastern Conference Finals in previous years despite always having strong teams.

But this year the Canes played a depleted Ottawa team in the first round and won in 4, then faced a weak Metropolitan division team in the Flyers in the second round and won in 4.

Then Carolina faced Montreal in the third-round, who had been to 2 prior Game 7s, and were obviously exhausted by the brutal Atlantic division gauntlet to that point as well as not being an experienced-enough team.

The Canadiens obviously gave everything in Game 1 and won convincingly, lost in overtime in games 2 and 3, and then had nothing left in the tank for games 4 and 5 on their way to getting absolutely routed.

But the Canadiens don't really play a very physical game, that's not MSL's style, and so it was very hard for them to try and counter Carolina's style.

And that win in 5, combined with the Canes facing a depleted Ottawa and a weaker Philadelphia, means that the Hurricanes came into the Finals quite well-rested for once instead of previous years where teams like Florida would "tenderize Carolina's meat" in the first couple of games, and then beat them on the scoreboard once they were exhausted, slower, and their gameplan less effective.

Instead, as a result of not having to expend too much stamina through 3 rounds, the Canes will likely win the Stanley Cup this year using their stifling playstyle, and good on them.

But the Canes' playstyle is HARD on its players physically, and can get hard-countered by the right kind of physical team.

There is no be all, end all in the playoffs.

Just try to slowly build your team up, and then try to win. That's all you can realistically do.

As for the OP, he's out to lunch AND a massive sensationalist if he thinks this year's Eastern Conference is the "worst ever".

The East completely dominated the West this year and has been generally dominant for the last couple years after teams from the West were the stronger ones in the 2000s and early 2010s.

I expect the East to continue dominating for the foreseeable future, then for us to reach a state of general balance, and then for the West to take over sometime after.

These things are cyclical in nature, and as rebuilding teams rise, contending teams will slowly peter-out and then turn into rebuilding teams themselves.

That's the rise and fall of franchises across the league, and it's this very volatility that makes Hockey great, instead of always having say the Dodgers at or near the top of the league each year, same for Real Madrid/Manchester City, and the list goes on.
This is why Carolina likely isn’t repeating. As much as I feel the league won’t be much better in 26-27 they have like no guys up for free agency so it may be almost the same roster again. Nobody was injured either so everyone has the mileage mentally and physically. I bet they have a slightly worse season and finish 2nd in the metro and don’t have the gas come April to get to the ECF or beyond. The Panthers benefited so much from 6-7 guys leaving the roster both years which is why that team never seemed tired like most cup winners have in the last 15-20 years
 
Why would I point to the 82 game sample size? That would be crazy.

I know it would break your blue heart to admit it but they are good teams. Carolina was a wagon this year and demolished a Vegas team that just dismantled a very good Colorado. They made good teams look less so all playoffs.

The east was good, particularly the Atlantic which had the best head to head record & goal differencial against other divisions. Habs & Sens were good enough to make the playoffs in that crucible. That is an objective argument.
Til a 6 game series is "demolished."

Right. So Winnipeg was the best team in the league last year right? Because 82 games said so.

Certainly you also think Pittsburgh and Philadelphia would've made the final had they been in the west too right?
What more could Carolina done to change your opinion?
They beat a very good Vegas team, they earned it as much as they can.

But if next year rolls around and they end up looking like Florida's easiest opponent again, thats going to be a tough look
 
Roslovic and Orlov instead of Ehlers and Miller
No Chatfield
Walker knocked out of the series
Rookie Stankoven
Rookie Blake

2026 is a very different team than 2025.

Canes scored nearly 4 goals a game down the stretch. They scored 4 goals or more in 7 of the final 8 games.
Walker was a huuuuge add
Miller and Ehlers too, but to a lesser extent imo
 
What more could Carolina done to change your opinion?

We're still hanging onto the Florida fantasy I see.

2 years older, no goalie, and no way to circumvent the cap.

Florida is old news, Carolina is the new Florida.
I'm tempted to engage those guys, but if they actually believe Carolina, Montreal, Buffalo, etc. were 'lucky', we've passed beyond any legitimate discussion. They're committed to their fantasy and you can't debate someone's imagination.
 
I'm tempted to engage those guys, but if they actually believe Carolina, Montreal, Buffalo, etc. were 'lucky', we've passed beyond any legitimate discussion. They're committed to their fantasy and you can't debate someone's imagination.
Carolina beat everyone in front of them, including a very good Vegas team. I've acknowledged that and will continue to do so. However its perfectly legitimate to suggest that they got lucky Florida was too banged up to make it.

I've said nothing about Buffalo being lucky.

Now how you can look at Montreal and their 10 shots a game as anything but lucky, I have no idea.
 
Carolina beat everyone in front of them, including a very good Vegas team. I've acknowledged that and will continue to do so. However its perfectly legitimate to suggest that they got lucky Florida was too banged up to make it.

I've said nothing about Buffalo being lucky.

Now how you can look at Montreal and their 10 shots a game as anything but lucky, I have no idea.
Montreal played three series and won two of them. 'Lucky' is nothing but a lame excuse from someone who dislikes the results.
 
Yeah there’s really nothing they could do. Carolina did everything they could, it’s just unfortunate that FLA had the injury bug.

I think most people aren’t that impressed with their win.
It feels a lot like the Seachickens winning the Super Bowl this year. A very good team, but something about their path to get there just felt underwhelming
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ryuji Yamazaki
Now that was a legitimately funny chirp. If I could hit like or laugh I would.

And I mean that genuinely
youve-been-a-bad-boy-havent-you-emily-prentiss.gif
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Frank Drebin
Til a 6 game series is "demolished."

Right. So Winnipeg was the best team in the league last year right? Because 82 games said so.

Demolished may be overstating but they were clearly the better team. Two different OT bounces and its a sweep.

The "Best" is a pretty nebulous thing in hockey. Injuries, who's hot, playing style of opponent and a lot more luck than most people would like to think go into winning games. I think it breaks down into tiers. Winnipeg winning the Presidents trophy puts them into the contender category.

The "best" is certainly not guaranteed to win the Cup, it usually the team playing the best with the most favourable matchups to their style, sometimes it isn't even that. Same for the Presidents Trophy with a big emphasis on health. They are both just data points in a complex system.
 
During 2022-2025, on average 6.5 of the 8 playoff teams in the East were in the playoffs also the year before. And on average 3.5 of the 8 playoff teams had won a series the previous year.

This year there were 2 back to back playoff teams (Carolina and Tampa) and 1 that had won a series the previous year (Carolina).

It's not difficult to deduce why Carolina made the finals this year but struggled the years before.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zeroG

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad