Weird statistic, but very cool at the same time.
Interesting Record Broken By Mark Jankowski, of All Players
- Thread starter TheReelChuckFletcher
- Start date
Uh duh...but it's still an interesting (and, apparently, historically significant) little heater that he has going on.
I’ve read this five times and I still don’t understand it.
4 shots on goal, 4 goals. Those 4 shots on goal were his first 4 for Hurricanes.
What part of this is hard to understand?
Turns out John Weisbrod knew what he was doing taking Jankowski in the first round. Paying off big time 13 years later
Strange player. Always had a surprisingly lethal shot.
Fits like a glove with Jagr, has a 4-goal game at the end of the year. Then has a stretch where he goes 50 games without a point in his final season in Calgary. Now he does this in Carolina
Fits like a glove with Jagr, has a 4-goal game at the end of the year. Then has a stretch where he goes 50 games without a point in his final season in Calgary. Now he does this in Carolina
No need snark, original tweet is dumb worded.
“Mark ‘blamo’ Jankowski first player to score 4 goals on first 4 shots with a new team.”
Boom, I worded it good.
He’s got another record progress too; longest draft project - he’s still on track to become the best player of his draft. Slowly but surely, he is getting there. Always had faith in the kid.
I'm not sure I understand. I looked at the game recap, and Jankowski has 2 goals. One of the highlight clips is titled "Jankowski's first NHL goal." What am I missing?
Mark Jankowski 2024-25 Stats per Game - NHL - ESPN
The 2024-25 NHL season stats per game for Mark Jankowski of the Carolina Hurricanes on ESPN. Includes full stats, per opponent, for regular and postseason.
4 SOG and 4 goals in 4 games he's played for Carolina, and of course 100% shooting%.
Most likely his shooting% is unsustainable.
The way you write it makes sense, I just couldn’t understand the tweet.
Two goals on March 9, two on March 15 and in the games in between he had no shots. Now it makes sense.
The math part. Have you ever read some of the grammar posted here? Not the sharpest box of pencils.
