Fistfullofbeer
Moderator
Well they were already paying him while not playing him, so this isn't totally out of the blue.
I want to know how this happens without it being considered a buy-out. Anyone know why this can be called "termination" instead? Is it because Kovalchuk is agreeing to it?
Either way, I think he's done in the NHL. Sad, because I loved this guy's game when he was with the Thrashers. He was the best player in the league after the three headed monster of Sid/Malkin/Ovie.
I would be interested in knowing this too. Is it because of his age? To me it should be a buyout not a termination.