Can we compromise? I think a puck over glass should be treated as an icing.Keep:
1. puck over glass penalty
- No one wants to go back to the days of the 'oops, accidental' puck out of play to force a faceoff
Can we compromise? I think a puck over glass should be treated as an icing.Keep:
1. puck over glass penalty
- No one wants to go back to the days of the 'oops, accidental' puck out of play to force a faceoff
Instead of having a team scratch and claw their way into the playoffs to get bounced in 4 games (Washington last year) it makes for more competitive matchups. And potentially bigger stories further in the playoffs.I have never heard anyone advocate for something like this, so can I ask if I have this right?
You'd want Washington to play Toronto in the first round right now, and Winnipeg to host Vegas. The Sens would be the seven seed with home ice against eighth seeded Montreal? The Wild would have had home ice against St Louis in a 7/8 matchup?
Why?
Was there evidence that they covered it up?
Unless anything else have come out, look at it from coach perspective. You are in the playoffs, you get this news with no way of proving it happened or not, and then being told it will be handled.
I kind of get the coach goes about his business of trying to win the playoffs with his team if this was told.
Though haven't read up about how exactly things went down.
But then you're going to end up with a team seeded no better than 5th in the conference finals, and that matchup has a higher tendency to be awful. Make it to the conference finals as a one or two seed, and that might as well be a bye more often than not.Instead of having a team scratch and claw their way into the playoffs to get bounced in 4 games (Washington last year) it makes for more competitive matchups. And potentially bigger stories further in the playoffs.
Where can one find this report?I don't want to derail this thread but re-litigating the incident so I won't get into it, but the short answer is yes. And that there's a full report on it available to read.
I also don't think he has been completely honest about when and where etc., but I also get when you are in that position, its difficult because unless there is video evidence, you cannot prove it beyond any doubt.There's plenty of evidence that they took no action to investigate an allegation that one of Quenneville's coaches sexually assaulted one of his player. Aldrich was given the choice of participating in an investigation or resigning. Quenneville has repeatedly lied about when he found out about it.
So I find this interesting, you want Bowman and Quenneville effectively banned from the league but wouldn’t havd a Donald Sterling esk forced team sale. I mean yes the Wirtz family would have made a couple billion (hopefully helping the other settlement) on the sale like Sterling, but I would think they should also be booted out of the league with the other key players. They are the largest power brokers in the entire organization and should not get out of the steepest punishment available in my opinion.
Ok, how 'bout icing on the first one, and penalties after that? I mean, I don't know that I've seen 2 puck-over-glass penalties in one game for the same team. It certainly can't be too common?Can we compromise? I think a puck over glass should be treated as an icing.
Stop screwing the Red Wings in the lottery. When Detroit is good the NHL thrives more...
Can we compromise? I think a puck over glass should be treated as an icing.
better linesmen who will drop the puck.FACE OFFS - I have no idea how to fix them, but they take too damn long to get the puck back into play!
That has been the obvious solution for 20 years, but apparently someone's going to have to lose a Cup because of it first.
But then you're going to end up with a team seeded no better than 5th in the conference finals, and that matchup has a higher tendency to be awful. Make it to the conference finals as a one or two seed, and that might as well be a bye more often than not.
I hated the over the glass rule when it was implemented but have come to appreciate it.
It encourages making an actual skill play versus high and hard off the glass. Don't want to risk taking a frustrating over the glass penalty? Keep the puck on the ice and make a play.
I linked to it in the first post. Basically the team that accumulates the best average points per game after being eliminated from the playoffs would get the 1OA pick and the remaining 'lottery' teams would draft in the order they finished. It incentivizes icing your best team and trying to win games.Can someone explain what "the Gold plan" is to me in dummy-talk?
Added the 30 second limit for video review under enforcing the rules. Thanks.fix the offside rule it's annoying how many good goals that nobody was complaining about before video review have been call off due to forensic investigation. If the review takes longer than 30 seconds the original call stands.
I think you'd see teams gladly throwing the puck over the glass to relieve pressure, especially if they are a good faceoff team.With referees routinely looking right at but ignoring the likes of boarding and cross checks to the face, how does it make sense that that is the one thing that is an automatic penalty every time?
A faceoff in your zone where the other team can change and you can't is still punitive enough to force players to try to avoid it.