MetalheadPenguinsFan
Registered User
For $900 that ring better make you invisible or some ****
Exactly.
For $900 that ring better make you invisible or some ****
In all seriousness though, I paid $900 for it. It is sterling silver, with a 6 carat Amethyst.
The text around the top says "Hammer that never breaks, and axe that never dulls"
On the inside, there is text that reads "Halls under the mountains, filled with gold"
That ring contains within it HFBoards, it must be destroyed at once. Take haste.
If we destroy the ring then do we effectively destroy CI too??
In all seriousness though, I paid $900 for it. It is sterling silver, with a 6 carat Amethyst.
The text around the top says "Hammer that never breaks, and axe that never dulls"
On the inside, there is text that reads "Halls under the mountains, filled with gold"
retweetmeh, who gives a **** about the ring, you add to the LNGE in a positive way.
retweet
Every time you go on a date And don't get laid you were ripped off
If CI is serious about paying $900 then holy **** he got ripped off....
ROFL you paid $900 for a $125 ring
If CI is serious about paying $900 then holy **** he got ripped off....
Ya Man CarolinasIdentity a bird he spent $900 on a $125 ring LMFAAAOOOOOOOO
Depends whether his has a legit amethyst or a cubic zirconia, like the one in your link.
Edit: TBH it might not make that much difference. Purple amethyst apparently isn't a particularly expensive stone.
Again, I think some people here are looking at it the wrong way. At face value, sure, paying 6 or 7 times the original price would seem....foolish.
But if this is a movie prop, then obviously it's going to hold more value.
Say, for example, someone wanted to buy a game-worn jersey. Obviously it's going to cost more than one you'd get at Sport Chek.
So saying something like "LOL, he paid $800 for a jersey when they're $200 in store, what a moron", it's just a bit short-sighted.
It's not even from anything