DingDongCharlie
Registered User
- Sep 12, 2010
- 11,323
- 10,208
OP thought he was cooking making this thread. Thread only proves the OP is cooked.
Thank for for getting it. I understand my posts are like abstract artwork, but the point was you need to get up and out or people will be calling for your head. And I respect Mike Grier.I think Grier has done a really good job.
With that said, I get where the OP is coming from, they need to see some progress and Grier needs to go to phase 2 of the rebuild plan next year, but it’s overzealous to have making the playoffs as the measure of a successful season. They are still too early in the rebuild and have too much dead money/garbage contracts for that to be realistic.
In my opinion, the plan for phase 2 should be:
1. Find some more pump and dump candidates that would take a 1 year contract to up their value, but that have the potential to put up big numbers and improve the team in the short term. Victor Olofsson seems like a good candidate. On the open market, he might only be a $2-3 mil player on a 2-3 year deal based on the season he had. Sell him on a 1 yr deal at $4 mil, playing with one of the young guns, and eventually being traded to a playoff bound team.
2. Target a bargain UFA from a winning team that shakes loose due to cap concerns. A name that comes to mind is Nick Perbix from Tampa. He’ll turn 27 in June, is their #6 Dman, but could probably be a #4 in SJ. Underrated offensive ability. A slight overpay and longer term to secure him might be required, but it would have high probability that he outperforms the contract once given the opportunity.
3. Alter the futures strategy next year. They have 2 firsts and 2 seconds this year and next, as well as a deep prospect pool. Any trades of rental players should target 2027 and 2028 draft picks, as those should be the target years to make the playoffs. Then the script gets flipped and they are looking for rentals at the deadline and will have a wealth of picks to do so. Also, teams sometimes pay a little more for deferring to later years. If the Sharks are selling Wennberg at the deadline next year and his value is a 2026 3rd, maybe a desperate team with a shrinking competitive window is low on 2026 picks will part with a 2028 2nd instead.
Phase 2 should only be for 2025 off-season. 2026 off-season should be more aggressive with more serious ambition to make the playoffs. But 2027 is the off-season all the dead cap space is gone. That’s the year they should look at starting to be a perennial playoff team.
Drafting and accumulating assets so far has been pretty good. Sharks had what was rated the best prospect pool in the league coming into the season and several players significantly outperformed expectations this year (Cagnoni and Chernyshov) with few I can think of who were particularly disappointing. The team is a long way from being any good, but it's hard to imagine anyone doing much better in the situation the Sharks were in.I wonder how many people said this about the Buffalo Sabres in 2014 or 2015.
It's possible that the Sharks will begin a "playoff run" in 2-3 years. It's also possible they won't, as it's very difficult to build an NHL team back to a level of sustained competitiveness after a long period at the bottom.
Anyway, as someone else said, it's far too early to judge Grier. So far, he cleaned house of veterans and contracts, which is kind of the easy part. But building it up only works if the drafting and development are really good, and that's where it gets dicey...
Check back in about two years and we evaluate how Grier did.
It’s a weird way of making your point. You’re calling out Grier in a negative way after he’s done a great job so far. Why would he be on the “hottest” seat when there other GMs out there who aren’t doing their job well at all?Thank for for getting it. I understand my posts are like abstract artwork, but the point was you need to get up and out or people will be calling for your head. And I respect Mike Grier.
If the sharks don't make the playoffs, or at least compete for a position. Two dead last finishes are an accomplishment on the boards but in the real world, it's an embarrassment. I think they have the tools and it's going to be time to stand and deliver. Another bottom 5 finish isn't going to cut it. He's my pick for GM on the hottest seat going in to next season.
I don't even know how much to really attribute the 2022 draft to Grier as well given the circumstances leading up to his hire. For three seasons and two real drafts, he's been quite effective at getting young talent to build around and putting the team in the best possible position for them. They need a team of young players that carry the team and they only had Eklund that would qualify as that sort of player from the previous management. Being bad with a purpose is better for a team's future than just being bad.These threads are in general dumb.
He takes over in 22 andd does drafts for 22/23
23/24
24/25
He inherented very little in the prospect pool. Unlike e other sports most draft picjs takr 6 years to be anything st the nhl level.
He's drafted 9 players in thr top 90 or so of each draft class.iirc he has 21st and 2 2nds for 25 draft
Celebrini and smith can't change the club alone.
They wanted the draft pick for ammo more than him, I think. They have wingers coming up and he's not indispensable.The Zetterlund trade is the one that gets me. Makes no sense.
Grier is doing a pretty damn good job in San Jose but I’m not surprised in the least to see this thread. I think there was a time a year back or maybe 2 where many people around here were saying that Grier was a poor GM.
And to think we essentially got 2 first round picks in return (Musty and a 2025 first for granlund).The fact that he somehow was able to trade Karlsson is pure sorcery IMO