Rachel Doerrie's "defense" of Hynes on The Hockey PDOcast (
The Hockey PDOcast) was essentially that he's one of the most open-minded hockey people she's ever met. People generally view open-mindedness as a positive attribute, but I'm not one of them in this case.
In the rush to be on the cutting edge, I think there's a great deal of mystery about what's truly actionable and demonstrable and what's a false correlation and just throwing **** at the wall.
Let's say you believe "fast, attacking, supportive" is a clear vision. It's not like this is Edmonton where half the roster literally cannot play the style the coach is asking. This is a question of the vision not being translated to the ice properly.