I thought you were drawing your own conclusions.
Only option I have. Though I suspect @Gary Nylund answered it on your behalf quite accurately.
Last edited:
I thought you were drawing your own conclusions.
You know and everyone else knows both what that stat means and why you guys are in such a tizzy over it.
OK maybe you have a history with that poster in unaware of. From the outside it seemed like a simple question.
My apologies
I think I was pretty clear when I explained why I don't think it means anything. It seems like nobody else knows what you think it means either, that's why people asked.
You say it means something, go ahead - I'm listening.
It seemed to be.OK maybe you have a history with that poster in unaware of. From the outside it seemed like a simple question.
My apologies
Wow the team is doing really well without Hyman, that's great considering he's a great player; they'll be in even better shape once he's back. Shows how great of an add Foligno has been too, he's really filled Hyman's injury void nicely; they're actually 4-0 with him now.5-1 without Hyman.
Just shows all those chicken-little sky is falling posters who said the leafs are easily out in the first round without Hyman didn't give the rest of this team the credit they deserve
*I'll tell you what I think. Your post might imply that we don't need Hyman as we're doing so well without him.
Wow the team is doing really well without Hyman, that's great considering he's a great player; they'll be in even better shape once he's back. Shows how great of an add Foligno has been too, he's really filled Hyman's injury void nicely; they're actually 4-0 with him now.
Our 5-1 record without 11 (actually 5-2 if you count the game 11 was injured) could also have to do with the fact that the competition has been pretty pathetic. Vancouver (2), Winnipeg (2), Montreal (1), and Vancouver (2) are currently all tire fires. At the moment the Oilers are barely the only other respectable team in the division. Bring on the American teams.
Are you suggesting that Hyman is not needed or just throwing out another useless statistic?
(quoted for context)Who insulted you?
Seems you should take your own advice about being sensitive
Tone.Heh.
His question contained a direct insult.
5-1 without Hymanzzz x/60Yay Leafs!!!! Go Leafs Go!!!!
bring on the playoffs!!!!
Are we back on track yet?
OK fair. I can see how that might seem confrontational. Perspective I guess? To me it didn't seem soHow does "or just another useless statistic" seem like a simple question to you?
Our 5-1 record without 11 (actually 5-2 if you count the game 11 was injured) could also have to do with the fact that the competition has been pretty pathetic. Vancouver (2), Winnipeg (2), Montreal (1), and Vancouver (2) are currently all tire fires. At the moment the Oilers are barely the only other respectable team in the division. Bring on the American teams.
Equally just as ok for posters to ask what he is getting at(quoted for context)
Tone.
There's nothing wrong with him posting a stat. I like posters throwing stats around, the irrelevant ones I just ignore & the relevant ones I take with a grain of salt or I make my own observation on it; I don't need Zeke's take on it to do that, he's got no obligation to do that.
absolutely true, just gotta keep tone of posts in mind.Equally just as ok for posters to ask what he is getting at
Well, since there was no explanation of the post, "we all" don't know what it does and doesn't mean. Hence the original question.
(which remains unanswered)
Ya and that's what we were discussingabsolutely true, just gotta keep tone of posts in mind.
He’s skating along with Nash.
Happy Sunday everyone. Grab a coffee. It’s always a good Sunday following a victory.
Hyman’s absence shows we are a deep team based on our record. And When he returns the team will even be better!
You guys should all be happy about that.
I think it's been clear for some time now that we're a deep team.
To be honest I was sceptical. But having Foligno in there after Hyman was injured is comforting.