Bryanbryoil
Pray For Ukraine
- Sep 13, 2004
- 88,586
- 39,905
Sucks for Carolina but it's better that they cut bait especially since he hasn't really settled in there by most accounts.
The general consensus was that the Avs were on crack trading Rantanen and that the Canes were brilliant.
Really?False. Everyone knew there was risk on both sides
Really?
People knew the risk sure, but barely anyone was saying it was a great piece of business for the Avs which it was. The Canes got all the praise.
The fact that there was little to no negotiation taking place leads me to believe the Avs made an organizational decision that they didn’t want one of their top 3 contracts for the next 8 years be a relatively one dimensional winger on the back half of his career. I don’t think this was just about a difference of 1-1.5M AAV.He would have received 90M+ just by sticking with the Avs. Instead decided to ask for more and was traded. You have to think the number is really damn important for Mikko.
He would have received 90M+ just by sticking with the Avs. Instead decided to ask for more and was traded. You have to think the number is really damn important for Mikko.
Reports suggest that the Avs were not going to break 12M for Rants. Good call imo, especially when a trade like this was available.The fact that there was little to no negotiation taking place leads me to believe the Avs made an organizational decision that they didn’t want one of their top 3 contracts for the next 8 years be a relatively one dimensional winger on the back half of his career. I don’t think this was just about a difference of 1-1.5M AAV.
I doubt it.I'm going to laugh when he signs with the AVS in the summer.
Did rantanen say he didn’t want ant to sign in Carolina? Or is it ALL just speculation from click bait artists?He seemed very upset and taken back by the trade and even came out after saying he'd have signed a discount. I think his heart is still with Colorado and I think there's a good chance he's back there for July 1st.
Without an agreed on extension every team should look at him as purely a rental. Don't pull a Carolina and trade or him and find out he has no interest in signing after and/or later.
If he's purely only shopped for his rental trade value I'd question why Carolina wouldn't just use him as their own rental.
It was in that you used Rantanen as a proxy for your own feelings.
Mine and 500 million others.
It’s funny that someone from a country of 200K people has to leach off of 499.8M others. But at least you’re no longer being passive.
No. No, it isn't.It's entirely possible he ends up back in COL.
Is Carolina really that much colder? Honestly asking
I assumed there was an agreement in principle with Rantanen before they did this. Terrible asset management giving up Necas + for a guy that’s going to possibly walk. They didn’t learn from Guentzel? Come on.Last year Guentzel, now Rantanen?