Value of: Huberdeau

bernmeister

Registered User
Jun 11, 2010
28,713
4,234
Da Big Apple
Any interest in a deal around Kreider?

you missed the memo, apparently.
CK does not go except for an upgrade or in a package for an elite
The young core will not ordinarily be traded, and Hubs is not extraordinary enough to be an exception.
The trade Kreider movement, like the trade Miller movement before it, should just give it up and focus on getting rid of AV.
but as to something for Huberdeau....


Only player from the Rangers I'd be interested in is Zucs. Doubt you're willing to part with him though. Hoping Crouse turns into our Kreider.

No thank you.

We can more than talk about Zucs.
I've been leaning Zuc for Vatanen, like that.

Zuc and Huberdeau as a core, yes; what small adds do you need?

If he waived, and we ate nearly half [2.75 off his 5.75 salary] do you have use for Marc Staal as 3LD, filling in higher during injuries? Unlike Girardi, Staal still has a lot left in the tank in right system -- not an AV system.

If the answer is yes, I'd say Rangers add two 4ths, Panthers add a 3rd and an expansion exempt lesser prospect, and we are good to go.
 

Beezeral

Registered User
Mar 1, 2010
10,029
5,224
Is not x1000. Pacioretty is our only proven goal-scorer. He's on a killer contract.

Huberdeau is 5 years younger and put up 5 less points than Max last season.

Bjugstad is an established #2 quality center signed to a great contract. Michael Mccarron is a prospect who has yet to establish himself and didn't show much in his short stint in the NHL last season.

Beaulieu and Matheson seem like a relative wash but I like Matheson's skating ability and so does the organization. Not a move they would make.

This trade gets the Habs younger and nets 2 established top 6 players in exchange for 1. Awful deal for the panthers. Put the bleu, blanc, et rouge, shades away
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad