RogerRoger
Registered User
- Jul 23, 2013
- 5,344
- 3,128
Lot of people on the Panthers' board don't value him much. So I was wondering what he could bring back in a trade.
I think the Panthers could use LD help but they'd be stupid to trade Huderdeau to address that need. A cheaper, reliable middle pairing guy would suffice.
jvr.
I think the top4 is set for years.
Yandle 29- Ekblad 20
Matheson 22- Demers 28.
Unless Huby wants out trading him doesn't make sense, 23y proven 1st line winger.
Off topic really but that's putting an awful lot of faith and pressure on Matheson after a total of 8 NHL games. Wouldn't you want to add someone, even a a 1 year deal?
I agree with you on Huberdeau.
If Huberdeau is available, I hope Habs will give a ton for him! He's a great player!
I think the Panthers could use LD help but they'd be stupid to trade Huderdeau to address that need. A cheaper, reliable middle pairing guy would suffice.
Kulikov had 17 points on the PP and top 4.
17 points.
Pysyk does not need to have any offense to outproduce him. If he can hit the net on even 2 of 10 shots he will outproduce him with this roster.
I think you are underrating the system being played and the roster we currently have. But, thats why they play the games.
No Stanley Cups awarded on July 16th.
just ing by some players behaviors I'm not sure everyone around the org is happy
Unless you are Huby or the with the Organization, that is a sad story to try and make something out of nothing. Why? Because you said so? Sure.
All you need to do is look at Nick Bjugstad. Who led the team in scoring when Hubs played with Nick.
I do not remember Bergenheim or Boyes leading the team. Weird.
Such as?
You should be asking that series of questions from yourself tbh if the situation is that unclear for you. If a player stays on the first line for that long with that performance, usually changes are needed. You think that Bjugstad played all season with proper players? That's is some straw man stuff. He was given what the depth of the org allowed and later on in the season came Hudler and Purcell who did the Houdini in the playoffs. That's ok, I don't expect you to remember much, but Bergenheim and Boyes didn't exactly led the team but they played much better considering their expectations when teamed up with Barkov. Barkov and Huberdeau was such meh, which still continues today due to lack of options and there's no good reason to break Troch's line.
Campbell. Mitchells Comments, the article that says tallon isn't really involved in the decision making process anymore... therewas a lot of moving parts this offseason that coukd have left a bad taste with some people.. this stuff doesn't usually happen after franchise personal best.. maybe that's y campbell wanted gone... who knows it's just very risky to make all these moves with a young team that has proven they r on the right path
Who are you going to get to replace Huberdeau for the same money who is better? And downgrading is not an option.You should be asking that series of questions from yourself tbh if the situation is that unclear for you. If a player stays on the first line for that long with that performance, usually changes are needed. You think that Bjugstad played all season with proper players? That's is some straw man stuff. He was given what the depth of the org allowed and later on in the season came Hudler and Purcell who did the Houdini in the playoffs. That's ok, I don't expect you to remember much, but Bergenheim and Boyes didn't exactly led the team but they played much better considering their expectations when teamed up with Barkov. Barkov and Huberdeau was such meh, which still continues today due to lack of options and there's no good reason to break Troch's line.