See my pass postings, I am no Anderson fan but base on contract I would take Anderson over Huby.Now Anderson is worth more then Huby ??? Jezzzz
See my pass postings, I am no Anderson fan but base on contract I would take Anderson over Huby.Now Anderson is worth more then Huby ??? Jezzzz
This kind of drop off is also pretty unprecedented. He isn't really a 115 point playre but he also isn't a 50 point player. No way to know now but I bet some GM would still sign him to a 7x9 contract and take the gamble his last 4 seasons are more representative than this one. I am pretty sure you were banging the Gaudreau should get a big raise after his subpar seasons before last yearIdk, it'd be pretty unprecedented to give that sort of contract to a player coming off a career worst season.
Well that's because Gaudreau is a much better player than Huberdeau, who was quite clearly being held back by his center.This kind of drop off is also pretty unprecedented. He isn't really a 115 point playre but he also isn't a 50 point player. No way to know now but I bet some GM would still sign him to a 7x9 contract and take the gamble his last 4 seasons are more representative than this one. I am pretty sure you were banging the Gaudreau should get a big raise after his subpar seasons before last year
You're right at least in that after last year someone was going to throw something that large at him.Someone was going to give him that extension. Maybe its a mill over, but in FA with multiple bidders prolly not, teams always overpay.
I will again reiterate that one bad season does not turn a guy who had the most assists for a LW in league history into a negative asset. Maybe the contract is a bit much but HAS TO BE massively negative is out to lunch.
I think he gets back to a PPG clip pretty quickly if he wasn't playing in Calgary. Huberdeau is clearly being held back by Sutter and his linemates etcWell that's because Gaudreau is a much better player than Huberdeau, who was quite clearly being held back by his center.
I don't disagree that he's better than a 50 point player. I think he's more likely in the 60-75 point range. Maybe someone gives him a big deal but idk. It's tough with the way the cap is.
If he puts up a ppg for 4/5 years then it isn't bad
Yes pls
I posted Huberdeau with 1 million retention for Miller and other posters didn't like it. It essentially makes them both 9 million dollar players with Calgary getting out of the deal a year sooner with Miller's playstyle more suited to Calgary and Huberdeau's more Vancouver.Some probably terrible ideas:
Huberdeau for Miller
Huberdeau + Markstrom (some retention) for Bob + Duclair
Huberdeau for Josh Anderson
Some probably terrible ideas:
Huberdeau for Miller
Huberdeau + Markstrom (some retention) for Bob + Duclair
Huberdeau for Josh Anderson
I don’t hate it if the Flames decide to throw in the towel and sell off their soon to be UFAsFrom Montreal I would offer
Gallagher + Armia + Sean Farrel/Josh Roy + Joel Edmundson or Rem Pitlick (if you want them) + CGY 1st round pick back (Monahan deal)
No thank you. Why does a rebuilding team trade for a player who has an 8-year contract beginning next season (as a 30-year-old) for $10.5 million per? Oh that's right, because he's French!!!From Montreal I would offer
Gallagher + Armia + Sean Farrel/Josh Roy + Joel Edmundson or Rem Pitlick (if you want them) + CGY 1st round pick back (Monahan deal)
Yeah, retention (at that level) or no, Miller's so far been better in the build up to the new contracts, and would still be paid less. I wouldn't be opposed to working out a Huberdeau deal, he's clearly still a great talent, but for a ton of reasons, Miller is the better buy for us.I posted Huberdeau with 1 million retention for Miller and other posters didn't like it. It essentially makes them both 9 million dollar players with Calgary getting out of the deal a year sooner with Miller's playstyle more suited to Calgary and Huberdeau's more Vancouver.
No thank you. Why does a rebuilding team trade for a player who has an 8-year contract beginning next season (as a 30-year-old) for $10.5 million per? Oh that's right, because he's French!!!
No but, the whole package is now suspect.Keep in mind, one shit year does not a value make,
Why would he be in Florida still? He was traded to Calgary.
It was incredibly stupid to sign him to that sort of contract before he ever played a game as a flame. It's kinda funny how they tried to penny pinch with Gaudreau for over a year (until the last minute), a guy with over 600 points as a flame, and then turned around and gave Huberdeau 10.5M the before he stepped foot on the ice.
Now because of that overreaction, they're stuck with an albatross of a contract that is the epitome of untradeable.
Joel Armia's contract is over after the 2024-25 season. Brendan Gallagher's contract expires at the end of the 2026-27 season, with there being a decent chance he winds up on LTIR. Jonathan Huberdeau's contract doesn't expire until the end of the 2030-31 season, which makes him a horrible option for the Canadiens.Huberdeau would be making 400k more than Gallagher + Armia combined and would probably contribute ~60 more points than them combined
Will trade OEL for Uber DohWell, with his agent being a bit of a jerk on Twitter last night...
If Hubby does want out, whats his value.
Keep in mind, one shit year does not a value make, and someone who is almost a PPG throughout his career didn't just forget to play hockey.
Calgary would like younger players back, and obviously will need to take some sort of cap back to make the transaction work.
Miller has more value than Uber Doh, plays harder and takes less cap hit. I would trade you OEL though. If we are trading Miller then Uber Doh needs a 25% retention lolSome probably terrible ideas:
Huberdeau for Miller
Huberdeau + Markstrom (some retention) for Bob + Duclair
Huberdeau for Josh Anderson