How Would Canadas Second Team Do vs Non Usa Canada Competition

  • We sincerely apologize for the extended downtime. Our hosting provider, XenForo Cloud, encountered a major issue with their backup system, which unfortunately resulted in the loss of some critical data from the past year.

    What This Means for You:

    • If you created an account after March 2024, it no longer exists. You will need to sign up again to access the forum.
    • If you registered before March 2024 but changed your email, username, or password in the past year, those changes were lost. You’ll need to update your account details manually once you're logged in.
    • Threads and posts created within the last year have been restored.
    • Our 2025 light and dark themes were lost, so we are rebuilding them. Light theme is currently available, but work in progress

    Our team is working with Xenforo Cloud to recover data using backups, sitemaps, and other available resources. We know this is frustrating, and we deeply regret the impact on our community. We are taking steps with Xenforo Cloud to ensure this never happens again. This is work in progress. Thank you for your patience and support as we work through this.

    In the meantime, feel free to join our Discord Server
My apologies mr.hardcore Hockey fan that joined this forum yesterday, but I do disagree. Sweden's depth falls off dramatically whereas Canada's does not, that's why I asked if Nylander is even better than Schief which you didn't answer (an expert like you should be able to do that) because it illustrated the point that even the top end advantage isn't as drastic or existing at all really.
I don’t think your question is valid. Maybe if you compared a RW for a RW ie Tom Wilson (lol) with Nylander. If you want to compare the teams you’d use a 1 for 1 approach. Bratt-Pettersson-Nylander vs two passengers + Scheifele. You are on thin ice.
 
I don’t think your question is valid. Maybe if you compared a RW for a RW ie Tom Wilson (lol) with Nylander. If you want to compare the teams you’d use a 1 for 1 approach. Bratt-Pettersson-Nylander vs two passengers + Scheifele. You are on thin ice.
Nah it's valid, they're both arguably their team's best players, Nylander is only marginally better than Schief (if at all), this isn't yesterday's Sweden, they've been degraded.
 
Nah it's valid, they're both arguably their team's best players, Nylander is only marginally better than Schief (if at all), this isn't yesterday's Sweden, they've been degraded.
Nah not valid and your wrong about Nylander being Sweden’s best player, see what I just did? I can do this for days, weeks, months.
 

Ad

Ad