How much blame should Gerry Cheevers get for Game 3 of the 1979 Challenge Cup?

How much blame should Gerry Cheevers get for Game 3 of the 1979 Challenge Cup?

  • Cheevers is mostly to blame

    Votes: 1 20.0%
  • Cheevers gets a bit more blame than the team in front of him

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Both the team and Cheevers played poorly

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Cheevers didn't play well but the team played worse

    Votes: 4 80.0%
  • Cheevers was left out to dry

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    5

Crosby2010

Registered User
Mar 4, 2023
897
750
Just like the other one with Mike Liut in 1981. This was the 3rd game of the series, the deciding game. 6-0 Soviets vs. the NHL All-Stars. A seriously stacked team, but I guess to be fair this replaced the All-Star game and they really did not have the time to prepare, unlike the 1981 Canada Cup team. Either way, they still won Game 1, had a 4-2 lead in Game 2, so it wasn't as if this shouldn't have been close. And just like in 1981, the score looks worse than it was. This was not a game that got out of hand early. I honestly think the Russians and Nabokov in the 2010 Olympics vs. Canada was worse than either 1979 or 1981 because that game got out of hand in a hurry. Because in that quarterfinal game it was 4-1 Canada at the end of the 1st. 6-1 Canada early 2nd, and 7-2 Canada 9 minutes into the 2nd. The final was 7-3. It was almost over before it started. Not so with the Challenge Cup. The game was scoreless at the 1st intermission. Then the Soviets scored two goals in the first half of the 2nd period. The game is only 2-0 at the 2nd intermission. And then the Soviets do what they do, they scored in bunches. 3-0 at the 8 minute mark. Then three more goals by the 14 minute mark. 6-0. Very similar to 1981, the back breaking goal was to make it 4-0. Liut got piled on a bit more in 1981 but I can argue that this game may have been worse. But was Cheevers worse and was he mostly to blame?

First goal nearly half of the game is gone and for whatever reason and old Mikhailov walks right around a young Barry Beck like he isn't even there. Nice shot past Cheevers. Probably not his fault. Second goal nice power play tap in, hard to stop that one. 3rd goal was just a bad play by Cheevers. A funky attempt at a poke check gone wrong, although it was a 2-on-1 against him. 4th goal is on Cheevers I think. He gets frozen on this goal, barely moves. It is a hard slap shot and it is another nice scoring attempt Team NHL allows but while they may have checked out by now this goal is the nail in the coffin. 5th goal is stoppable too by Makarov. Nice backhand but Cheevers isn't playing it right. 6th goal is a slap shot that freezes Cheevers again. But it makes it 6-0 so it doesn't change much.

I am thinking that Cheevers gives the team a chance to win early on. He does what a goalie should do and keeps them in the game. The first two goals aren't on him, they are good. The 3rd period is where they fall apart, Cheevers too, but keep in mind Team NHL does not score a single goal this game. 6 goals on 19 shots for Cheevers. What is your opinion on it?
 
Just like the other one with Mike Liut in 1981. This was the 3rd game of the series, the deciding game. 6-0 Soviets vs. the NHL All-Stars. A seriously stacked team, but I guess to be fair this replaced the All-Star game and they really did not have the time to prepare, unlike the 1981 Canada Cup team. Either way, they still won Game 1, had a 4-2 lead in Game 2, so it wasn't as if this shouldn't have been close. And just like in 1981, the score looks worse than it was. This was not a game that got out of hand early. I honestly think the Russians and Nabokov in the 2010 Olympics vs. Canada was worse than either 1979 or 1981 because that game got out of hand in a hurry. Because in that quarterfinal game it was 4-1 Canada at the end of the 1st. 6-1 Canada early 2nd, and 7-2 Canada 9 minutes into the 2nd. The final was 7-3. It was almost over before it started. Not so with the Challenge Cup. The game was scoreless at the 1st intermission. Then the Soviets scored two goals in the first half of the 2nd period. The game is only 2-0 at the 2nd intermission. And then the Soviets do what they do, they scored in bunches. 3-0 at the 8 minute mark. Then three more goals by the 14 minute mark. 6-0. Very similar to 1981, the back breaking goal was to make it 4-0. Liut got piled on a bit more in 1981 but I can argue that this game may have been worse. But was Cheevers worse and was he mostly to blame?

First goal nearly half of the game is gone and for whatever reason and old Mikhailov walks right around a young Barry Beck like he isn't even there. Nice shot past Cheevers. Probably not his fault. Second goal nice power play tap in, hard to stop that one. 3rd goal was just a bad play by Cheevers. A funky attempt at a poke check gone wrong, although it was a 2-on-1 against him. 4th goal is on Cheevers I think. He gets frozen on this goal, barely moves. It is a hard slap shot and it is another nice scoring attempt Team NHL allows but while they may have checked out by now this goal is the nail in the coffin. 5th goal is stoppable too by Makarov. Nice backhand but Cheevers isn't playing it right. 6th goal is a slap shot that freezes Cheevers again. But it makes it 6-0 so it doesn't change much.

I am thinking that Cheevers gives the team a chance to win early on. He does what a goalie should do and keeps them in the game. The first two goals aren't on him, they are good. The 3rd period is where they fall apart, Cheevers too, but keep in mind Team NHL does not score a single goal this game. 6 goals on 19 shots for Cheevers. What is your opinion on it?

The passing action prior to Kovin's goal was pretty sick.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Crosby2010
I always wonder why Cheevers was even part of the team. He wasn’t the 2nd best goalie in the NHL in 1979. It probably should have been Resch, but Edwards, Smith, Esposito, Palmateer, Davidson were all also better in 79.

My guess is that Bowman didn't want to lose Game 3 with Dryden in net and not give the other's a shot at it. Especially since Dryden didn't have a good Game 2. Cheevers was never about stats, he was always about wins. Esposito as well did better against the Soviets, as did Cheevers, than Dryden normally would. Resch is a good choice too, and Edwards had been a 2nd team all-star in 1978. Bowman ran into this issue in 1981 as well. He used Edwards in the round robin game against the Soviets, but kept Liut for the final game blowout. Was that a mistake? Bowman may not have wanted to use "his" goalie in Buffalo since Liut had just been the Pearson winner in 1981. That 1979 team definitely had the veteran netminders in there, and I assume in a short tournament that's what they were looking for.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bear of Bad News
adding hide avatars option

Ad

Ad