SeanMoneyHands
Registered User
- Apr 18, 2019
- 14,901
- 14,086
The big thing is he won't have Kucherov sending him tape to tape cross ice passes on the PP.
He will still have Josi on the PP.The big thing is he won't have Kucherov sending him tape to tape cross ice passes on the PP.
The big thing is he won't have Kucherov sending him tape to tape cross ice passes on the PP.
I took 30-35 as it seems the most reasonable outcome.30 +/- 5 if healthy.
He also won't have to compete for PP shots with Point
It'll be a trade off. Will be more of a trigger man but won't be fed the puck as well.
Forsberg is a better player and scorer than PointHe also won't have to compete for PP shots with Point
It'll be a trade off. Will be more of a trigger man but won't be fed the puck as well.
Forsberg is a better player and scorer than Point
Forsberg doesn't play the PP or something?
Forsberg is a better player and scorer than Point
The same people who say Stamkos will decline without Kucherov will say Point is better without noting that he also has Kucherov. Put Forsberg on the Lightening since 2018 and he has multiple 100 point 50 goal seasonsReally?
Actually Forsberg is underrated by most.
I have set up a new poll for these players. I think Point will win.
Kucherov on a completely different level than anyone that has ever played for NashvilleI don't understand your question, are you suggesting Forsberg is a better passer than Kucherov?
Agreed. Kucherov is a better player and scorer than Forsberg.
I don't understand your question, are you suggesting Forsberg is a better passer than Kucherov?
Agreed. Kucherov is a better player and scorer than Forsberg.
Huh? It means Fosberg is another trigger man on the PP. So moving from Point to Fosberg is the exact same thing while having a significantly worse passer to deal with.