For the sake of comparison, Brett Hull scored in 58.4% of his games played. If he played the same amount of games as Matthews in this scenario (1473 total GP), he'd have scored on a pace of 860 goals. Interesting part here though, is that Matthews came into the league as a 19 year old, and Brett Hull was 23 in his first full season. If Matthews were to have a similar career, which is entirely possible, he could hit or surpass that 860 goal mark in this hypothetical scenario.
A few things about Hull. Yes he started much "older" than Matthews but he scored a big chunk of his goals (500) in an higher scoring era. His 5 years peak was still incredible but while he was still a good goal scorer after that, he couldn't keep the pace very long. But yes, if he started playing in the NHL at a younger age, he would have easily broke the 800 goals barrier.
Matthews has been a bit unlucky with Covid and injuries but if things stabilize and he stays healthy, he could seriously score a lot more during the next decade
If we take it for granted that he plays a higher % of games over the next 14yrs than he has over his first 5 and lands solidly in the top 30 of all time for games played, yeah he's going to score some goals. Likely deep into the 700s.
He played 407/455 Toronto Maple Leafs games since 2016-17, which is
89.45%
In my proposed scenario, his ratio of games played would be
92.85%
Also, elite talents tend to play longer than good players. And the athleticism level has gone up a lot in last decades, best athletes of today will probably all play above 1500 games (McDavid, Draisaitl, MacKinnon, Ovechkin, etc). Joe Thornton just played 1714 games... If you play an average of 75 games and started at 19 y/o, you could reach 1000 games before age 32
I know you want these arguments to work out but it is what it is.
642 goals in 1066 games to reach 901. You seem to be asking what is reasonably possible, not what is likely, so I voted 901. I'd say 700-750 is the most likely range.
That sounds "crazy" but at the same time, that G/GP (0.60) lower than his current career G/GP (0.64)
A lot will depend on how much he scores in the next few years. If he takes a good "lead", that could contribute to offset any future decline
Keep in mind that Ovechkin’s lull you mentioned, combined with entering the league a year older than Matthews, having a shortened season due to lockout, and league scoring going down means that Matthews could very well end up with a solid edge in goals at 30. Since Ovechkin seems poised to push for 900, if Matthews has a strong finish to his 20s, he doesn’t necessarily need to be as good as Ovechkin in his 30s.
For example, after his age 24 season, Ovechkin had 269 goals to Matthews’ 259 after his. His next 5 seasons, he had 206 goals due to the lull and lockout. If Matthews averages 50 goals over those 5 years, it puts him at 509 going into his age 30 season. If he played another 10 years to 39, he’d only have to average just under 30 goals a season. At 45 over the next 5, it’s just under 35.
Thanks for making the point I have been trying to make in that other thread. Just maybe didn't express myself correctly