How Long Did It Take Gretzky to be Regarded as the GOAT? | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

How Long Did It Take Gretzky to be Regarded as the GOAT?

NVious

Registered User
Dec 20, 2022
1,587
6,933
Was there a ground swell of that thought as he entered the league (as in his potential not actually being the greatest) and then after 4 cups it became unanimous or did it take longer?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bozo Nicholson
He was the best in history within his first three seasons, considered the greatest by most after winning the Cup in 1984, and got most of the last holdouts on board after winning it again and picking up the Conn Smythe in 1985.

So he was the greatest after just five seasons—six seasons tops.

As @MrLunatik already said, the term GOAT specifically and the tunnel vision it allowed these discussions to devolve into didn’t really begin for all players in all sports until much later.
 
There were grumblings in 1981-82, but there was a lot of doubt, especially after the 1983 Cup run where he was pretty ineffective in the finals against the Islanders. He played a non traditional style in an era where coaches and the media wanted everyone to be Potvin or Messier. But his crazy regular season totals got him lots of attention. By 1984 he was put in the conversation.

Even after the first Cup win, where Messier cleanly outplayed him in the finals, there was some doubters. But 1985 solidified it. It was just too much. Year after year of monster point totals, big playoff runs, and Hart Trophies.

Some time in the March 1983 through May 1985 timeline. People forget. But in two years he went from "can't win with him" reputation, to a two time Cup winner and Canada Cup winner.
 
Last edited:
There were grumblings in 1981-82, but there was a lot of doubt, especially after the 1983 Cup run where he was pretty ineffective in the finals against the Islanders. He played a non traditional style in an era where coaches and the media wanted everyone to be Potvin or Messier. But his crazy regular season totals got him lots of attention. By 1984 he was put in the conversation.

Even after the first Cup win, where Messier cleanly outplayed him in the finals, there was some doubters. But 1985 solidified it. It was just too much. Year after year of monster point totals, big playoff runs, and Hart Trophies.

Some time in the March 1983 through May 2025 timeline. People forget. But in two years he went from "can't win with him" reputation, to a two time Cup winner and Canada Cup winner.

This is how I remember it too, by about 85 the only holdouts were hardcore Orr fans, and hardcore Habs fans. But even they came around a year or two later.
 
Was there a ground swell of that thought as he entered the league (as in his potential not actually being the greatest) and then after 4 cups it became unanimous or did it take longer?
It was while he was with the Oilers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fatass
The weird thing was it didn't even look like he was trying, after the 2nd Cup, he was just playing and having fun racking up points. He was a freak.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Perfect_Drug
There were many hockey people who thought he was the best hockey player ever fairly early in his career. Of course it grew larger over his career.

And, on the other end, there are still many who think he's not the greatest ever, most commonly with Lemieux and/or Orr ahead.
 
I can't imagine that it took long. He had 92 goals and a 200 point season by his 3rd year and the nickname "The Great One" from the time he was a child. I'm sure the only holdouts left by the end of his 4th year were the "hE HaZnT wUn An CuP!" edgelords who refused to distinguish the fact his team lost to a dynasty.

My man probably wins 7 or 8 titles like a 1960's Celtic if he's not traded to Los Angeles
 
I can't imagine it took very long. He had 92 goals and a 200 point season by his 3rd year and the nickname "The Great One" from the time he was a child. I'm sure the only holdouts left by the end of his 4th year were the "hE HaZnT wUn An CuP!" edgelords who refused to distinguish the fact his team lost to a dynasty.

My man probably wins 7 or 8 titles like a 1960's Celtic if he's not traded to Los Angeles
It wasn't just that they lost. They got swept and it wasn't close.

After being a 200+ point player and demolishing weak teams in the playoffs, Gretzky only had 4 assists and 0 goals in the sweep.

It's also the 1981 Canada Cup. The States held him to 1 assist in the semi final and he was pointless in the finals against the Soviets.

There was definitely a reputation that he couldn't get it done when it mattered. That when games got tight, defense was elite, he disappeared.

Obviously that went away. But after getting swept in 1983 it was a decently popular opinion.
 
It wasn't just that they lost. They got swept and it wasn't close.

After being a 200+ point player and demolishing weak teams in the playoffs, Gretzky only had 4 assists and 0 goals in the sweep.

It's also the 1981 Canada Cup. The States held him to 1 assist in the semi final and he was pointless in the finals against the Soviets.

There was definitely a reputation that he couldn't get it done when it mattered. That when games got tight, defense was elite, he disappeared.

Obviously that went away. But after getting swept in 1983 it was a decently popular opinion.
I mean I can understand why. But I have to imagine in a world where it took Bobby Orr 4 years to win his first of what should have been 4 to 6 titles (if you ask Phil Esposito that is) most fans would have at conceded to being at the same level and it was just a question of how many titles Wayne would win eventually

The only place I wouldn't expect an ounce of sympathy until Gretzky won multiple titles is maybe Montreal
 
October 15, 1989. When he passed Howe in points.
It was before that, most fans recognized that Howe's statistical achievements were enhanced by the length of his career. Gretzky was talked up as the greatest ever a few years before he broke the record.
 
Was there a ground swell of that thought as he entered the league (as in his potential not actually being the greatest) and then after 4 cups it became unanimous or did it take longer?
Montreal made a trade in 76 for 1980 first round draft pick. 1980 would have been his draft year if rules didn't change in 78. Habs drafted first that year with a pick from the rockies
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad