How is almost every Sabres player scoring way above their xG 5on5?

Bjornar Moxnes

Registered User
Oct 16, 2016
12,163
4,691
Troms og Finnmark

This isn't just a case of their top-line scoring above their xG, even most of their bottom-pairing forwards and Dman are having unsustainable shooting percentages 5on5. Plus while Tage Thompson is an excellent player and shooter, he's well above the second player in scoring above his xG 5on5, with 7 goals scored above his expected. Kucherov one of the best players in the league has only 5 goals scored above his expected. Byram has a pathetic xG and has scored 3 goals, and from replays, all of them were extremely soft and terrible goals for goalies to give up.

Only Vegas has had more unsustainable shooting than the Sabres. Even the elite top of the league teams haven't nearly the same success as Sabres in 5on5 scoring above their expected goals. The Sabres had a single high danger chance all game 5on5 and scored 4 goals...

1731359172087.png
 

BoHorvat 53

What's a god to a Kane
Dec 9, 2014
3,984
2,285

This isn't just a case of their top-line scoring above their xG, even most of their bottom-pairing forwards and Dman are having unsustainable shooting percentages 5on5. Plus while Tage Thompson is an excellent player and shooter, he's well above the second player in scoring above his xG 5on5, with 7 goals scored above his expected. Kucherov one of the best players in the league has only 5 goals scored above his expected. Byram has a pathetic xG and has scored 3 goals, and from replays, all of them were extremely soft and terrible goals for goalies to give up.

Only Vegas has had more unsustainable shooting than the Sabres. Even the elite top of the league teams haven't nearly the same success as Sabres in 5on5 scoring above their expected goals. The Sabres had a single high danger chance all game 5on5 and scored 4 goals...

View attachment 929306

Because things like expected goals aren't the entire puzzle, they're just a piece of it and it's not something that should be used at a micro level, but rather a macro level when analyzing a certain amount of games (The more the better) rather than just an individual game.

And it doesn't account for talent, someone like Tage Thompson who is one of the best goal scorers in the league is very likely to outperform his expected goal total.
 

Bjornar Moxnes

Registered User
Oct 16, 2016
12,163
4,691
Troms og Finnmark
Because things like expected goals aren't the entire puzzle, they're just a piece of it and it's not something that should be used at a micro level, but rather a macro level when analyzing a certain amount of games (The more the better) rather than just an individual game.

And it doesn't account for talent, someone like Tage Thompson who is one of the best goal scorers in the league is very likely to outperform his expected goal total.
Okay well even in Byram's case every goal I've seen him score this year are goals that beer league goalies would get shit on for letting in. I haven't analyzed every goal scored by the rest of the team to make a judgment.
 

TheDawnOfANewTage

Dahlin, it’ll all be fine
Dec 17, 2018
12,937
19,140

This isn't just a case of their top-line scoring above their xG, even most of their bottom-pairing forwards and Dman are having unsustainable shooting percentages 5on5. Plus while Tage Thompson is an excellent player and shooter, he's well above the second player in scoring above his xG 5on5, with 7 goals scored above his expected. Kucherov one of the best players in the league has only 5 goals scored above his expected. Byram has a pathetic xG and has scored 3 goals, and from replays, all of them were extremely soft and terrible goals for goalies to give up.

Only Vegas has had more unsustainable shooting than the Sabres. Even the elite top of the league teams haven't nearly the same success as Sabres in 5on5 scoring above their expected goals. The Sabres had a single high danger chance all game 5on5 and scored 4 goals...

View attachment 929306

It’s a thing where the puck crosses far enough over the goal line to count, then they award the Sabres something called a “goal”. I think they do it by shooting the puck, not certain on that though, and in small sample sizes some of those goals may not look great. Think they still count the same though, thus your confusion.

Srsly though, the f*** kinda explanation do you expect? Sorcery? Doctored pucks? Voodoo? If you wanna say Sabres are due to sink just say it, that’s fairer than a question when you know the answer.
 

Barrie22

Shark fan in hiding
Aug 11, 2009
25,620
7,116
ontario
It’s a thing where the puck crosses far enough over the goal line to count, then they award the Sabres something called a “goal”. I think they do it by shooting the puck, not certain on that though, and in small sample sizes some of those goals may not look great. Think they still count the same though, thus your confusion.

Srsly though, the f*** kinda explanation do you expect? Sorcery? Doctored pucks? Voodoo? If you wanna say Sabres are due to sink just say it, that’s fairer than a question when you know the answer.
Don't think it's called a shot, joe thornton had 430 goals in his career and never shot the puck once.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: hotcabbagesoup

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad