How Good would team North America be? (read OP)

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates

how would team North America U24 (read OP) stack up against the 4 nations teams?

  • best

    Votes: 2 4.5%
  • 2nd best

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 3rd best

    Votes: 8 18.2%
  • 4th best

    Votes: 15 34.1%
  • worst

    Votes: 19 43.2%

  • Total voters
    44

Dion TheFluff

Registered User
Jun 22, 2015
4,182
3,698
say you dropped team North America (U24 squad) into the 4 nations tournament, where would they rank amongst the 4 other rosters/countries?

this is the hypothetical lineup I made up
Boldy J. Hughes Caufield
Jarvis Cooley Guenther
Johnston Celebrini Bedard
Knies McMichael Holloway
Johnson

Sanderson Faber
Harley Vlasic
Power Byram
Hutson

Wolf
Knight
Fowler
 
That defense would get touched.

Tbf, that was the presumption (and the actual weakness I guess) of the 2016 team, which nevertheless held its own that tournament. Iirc, Shayne Gostisbehere was the most accomplished/biggest name on that D-corps.

What I believe speaks against a 2025 iteration which had worked well for them in 2016, is that they were outskating the old, slower guard of the NHL. Their generation has defined the current era NHL and I don’t think the younger generation can pounce on the same weaknesses.

Worst

This group of talent doesnt have a

Mackinnon

Level player

Mackinnon stalled in his development and wouldn’t clear his rookie season marks of 24-39-63 until the 2017-18 season, his fifth in the NHL.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tarheelhockey
Seems beside the point since Crosby unlike McDavid, Matthews and Mackinnon didn’t play on the former North America team.

daver’s gotta daver though

Little pedantic I think.

The OP didn't ask if they would do better or worse than than the former NA team, it asked where it would be ranked so, no, it is not besides the point to say they don't have a Crosby.
 
Little pedantic I think.

The OP didn't ask if they would do better or worse than than the former NA team, it asked where it would be ranked so, no, it is not besides the point to say they don't have a Crosby.

Matthews, Mackinnon and McDavid are relevant to the comparison only because they’d actually featured on something called Team North America the last time the NHL arranged an international tournament, and because they outdid expectations that time. It’s clear the poster’s quote referred to that iteration of Team NA.
 
That team would be last place. The blueline and goalies are clearly a weakness. The forwards group, while talented, doesn't have the star power to make up for it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Voight
Yea I don’t understand the comments. The blue line is pretty decent. Faber is already on USA and Sanderson was a consideration, and Vlasic likely will be a consideration for 2026. Meanwhile Harley is the call up for Canada with Theodore going down.
Sanderson made USA with Hughes out IIRC. Yeah, I think this team would actually be really close to the Swedes TBH
 
Sanderson made USA with Hughes out IIRC. Yeah, I think this team would actually be really close to the Swedes TBH

Yea, I forgot about Sanderson being the injury replacement.

The roster is deeper than Finland’s and with a much better defense imo, especially with Heiskanen out. I don’t know if any of their D even make this roster. Maybe Lindell. They have better star forwards, but only about half the forwards would make it as well. The Finns seem to play better as a team though so this one would need to gel
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dion TheFluff

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad