Ishdul
Registered User
- Jan 20, 2007
- 3,991
- 191
Is anyone?We might be arguing the same point, seems like he wasn't good enough to coast as an NHLer.
Is anyone?We might be arguing the same point, seems like he wasn't good enough to coast as an NHLer.
"I'm glad I got drafted first, because no one remembers number two" - Alexandre Daigle
Number two being Chris Pronger![]()
137 or something points in junior there I think it said.
That's just a massive total, even for junior. I seem to remember he was compared almost to the same level as Lindros. That he only achieved mediocre status came as a huge dissapointment to all involved.
One of my favourite newspaper headlines ever came after Pamela Anderson dumped him. "Daigle can't score off the ice, either".
While Daigle was a gigantic bust, people seem to forget his first two seasons. He was actually decent for those 2 years. He then had a decent half-season stretch in Philly, then scored 51 points in the dead-puck era.
only laughing at you because it was posted in the thread earlier
it is not a big thread--so obviously you did not read it
as for how good he was supposed to be
Yserman and Sakic was the prediction
but the warning lights came on quickly as reports started coming out shortly after the draft about his attitude and other stuff.
Anytime people ask why teams put so much energy into psych reports--Daigle is the name that first pops out as to why. SOme people figured that using the standards they use now for drafting--daigle would have suffered a robbie schremp style of drop in his draft year.
Just a nitpick, Daigle was far more of a playmaker than a goal-scorer in junior, with twice as many assists than goals. In the AHL he had 21 goals and 50 assists. In the Swiss league is was 53 and 113.What in the world do you consider a bust then..? He was brought to the Sens for the sole purpose of scoring goals. He did the exact opposite of that during his ENTIRE career. His highest goal total was 26.