Hockey Outsider
Registered User
- Jan 16, 2005
- 9,167
- 17,062
Agreed. I'll also add - it's not just the fact that Ovechkin is about to beat Gretzky's total, it's the fact that nobody else is even close. Twenty years ago, if you told me that Ovechkin would be on the verge of beating Gretzky's goals record, I would have assumed that scoring skyrocketed, so there would have been a bunch of players at least in the 700+ goals range. What makes it so impressive is (believe it or not) there have only been three other players who have even reached 500 goals over the past 20 years (Crosby is a distant second, at 619). For context, over the course of Gretzky's career, 12 other players reached 500 goals.I think the fact that he's continuing to score at such a high clip despite his age is a bigger deal than breaking the record. He's top five in goals at age 39 in a season where he suffered a fractured leg. That's ridiculous.
When Ovechkin hit 800 goals, I think it became apparent he would break the record. But to do it scoring at such a high clip so late in his career is very impressive and better than getting there with ~25 goal seasons.
I don't think it would be even close. They're probably be fairly close over their best 5-7 years, but Howe would run away with it beyond that timeframe. VsX has its limitations (which are discussed in detail in the summary thread), but as a rough ballpark, it shows Howe as having more than 300 more "adjusted" goals. (On the other hand, we're comparing 26 years of Howe to 20 years of Gretzky, so it's quite a bit closer on a per game basis).Gretzky peaked in one of the highest scoring eras ever. Howe peaked in one of the lowest. Gretzky beat Howe's goal record by 10%. It's conceivable that in more normalized conditions Gretzky doesn't beat Howe.
Gretzky beat Howe's assists by 80%. Even in a flipped scoring environment Gretzky still gets the assist record.
I like this framework. I'd expand on it. To get 800+ goals, a player needs:To rack up 750+ (or whatever) NHL goals, the player needs these things (besides elite-talent, obviously):
1. Perfect-storm timing / situation (higher scoring and not leaving the NHL, say)
2. Health / Endurance
3. Ability to adapt goal scoring across different eras
4. Motivation to keep at his highest / peak level even in down years or when team sucks, etc.
1) Talent (I'm being intentionally vague on this - some combination of speed, shot accuracy, hockey IQ, etc)
2) Health (we can debate how much of that is due to luck, genetics and motivation)
3) Long schedule length (ideally 80+ games per year)
4) Ability to have a long career (larger league with more roster spots availability - and no defection to a rival league)
5) High-scoring league - which boosts the raw numbers
6) Shooter's mentality - the willingness to prioritize shooting over passing
7) Motivation and consistency (willingness to play when not 100% healthy, keep trying when team isn't competitive, etc)
In terms of candidates:
- Richard - yes for 1, 2, 6 and 7
- Howe - yes for 1, 2, 4 (league doubled in size as he was getting older), 6 and 7
- Hull - yes for 1, 2, 6 and 7 (defecting to the WHA really hurts - had a fair chance of reaching 800 if he stayed)
- Bossy - 1, 3, 4 (the opportunity was there but health didn't allow him to take advantage), 5, 6 and 7
- Lemieux - 1, 3, 4, 5, 6
- Gretzky - 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 (for the first half of his career), 7
- Ovechkin - 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7 (I wouldn't say yes to 5 overall, but the boost the past half-decade certainly helps)
Last edited: