I don't know why you would. Ciccarelli has him beat on pretty much every metric. Ciccarelli might be an extremely marginal Hall of Fame case but that doesn't mean Larmer whose case is even more marginal was any better or more justifiable as far as the Hall is concerned.
Larmer's resume actually reminds me of Brian Bellows who was also a good player but not really a Hall guy.
Ciccarelli has him one one metric - career goals.
In terms of offensive peak, they're nearly even :
Ciccarelli's top 5 seasons in adjusted points were 88, 78, 77, 75, 72.
Larmer's top 5 seasons in adjusted points were 90, 75, 74, 72, 72.
Neither ever was a post-season All-Star. Ciccarelli was top-10 in points twice, Larmer once.
So offensively, they're pretty well a wash.
Defensively, Larmer destroys Ciccarelli. Like, not even close. Larmer was a terrific three-zone player who was great on the PK, a real SH threat, and usually the defensive presence on his line for the bulk of his career. Ciccarelli, on the other hand, was below-average defensively, never killed penalties, and was most noted for his PP work.
As players, for the decade that their primes overlapped, Larmer was quite simply the better player. He was basically Ciccarelli's equal offensively while playing a massively more advanced all-around game. A team of Larmers would have slaughtered a team of Ciccarellis.
In terms of playoffs, Larmer was a key player on a Cup winner. Ciccarelli never was.
Ciccarelli was also passed over 3 times in the prime of his career for Canada Cups, while Larmer was one of the top players on the 1991 Team Canada. So Larmer has and edge in international play.
The HHOF is also supposed to recognize class and character, and how a player conducted himself on and off the ice. Larmer was a class act on and off the ice from start to finish. Ciccarelli was a first rate asshat who was jailed for one of the worst stick-swinging incidents in the modern era, and was also jailed off-ice for exposing himself to a female neighbour. Guy was a dirty player and a jerk, and that should have worked against him.
When comparing the two players, the only thing that Ciccarelli has over Larmer is that he played longer. Larmer played his last NHL game at age 33 while still an excellent player as he wanted to move on to new challenges after scoring 1000 points and winning a Cup - if he'd hung on until 39 like Ciccarelli did, he would have matched his 1200 or so career points.
If anything Larmer beats Ciccarelli on almost every metric.