mk80
Registered User
- Jul 30, 2012
- 8,219
- 8,830
Went back and watched the game after it's conclusion. Overall a great win to get the season started! Loved the goal by Neighbours, great to see him making an impact already.
I 100% agree. The days of a top defenseman being stay at home guy are over. Top guys are able to impact game in all zones. Krug is a core player in spite of being a liability at times in own end. We have 2 excellent pairs. It’s the 3rd pairing that is concern (and why Peru injury was such a loss).For all of the criticism (plenty of it is valid) of the Blues' defense, they were crucial in the first four goals the Blues scored. Leddy's pinch on Neighbours' goal, Krug's set-up to Buchnevich, and Faulk's being a monster all over the ice on the other two.
I expect the Blues to embrace the continually rising trend of active defense. This year, I've already seen so many goals scored by defensemen driving straight to the net, not just on the rush or clean setups off the cycle, but also for rebounds.
Multiple times last night, Tarasenko smoothly, instinctively filled in when Krug pinched. That's simply going to be a thing with Krug on the ice, but I think it's going to be a prominent feature of the entire team all year. And I think it's not just going to help them keep up, but flourish at times because their defense, as a whole, is clearly above average at making something out of offensive zone chaos.
still have hopes for Mikkola. he shows flashes of what he CAN be.. just needs to be that more consistentlyI 100% agree. The days of a top defenseman being stay at home guy are over. Top guys are able to impact game in all zones. Krug is a core player in spite of being a liability at times in own end. We have 2 excellent pairs. It’s the 3rd pairing that is concerns (and why Peru injury was such a loss).
Kyrou definitely takes a lot of blame for that goal as well. Both Kyrou and Binner made bad plays on that play. Id even said that fact that Kyrou was the last man back means the defense should also take some blame as well.You're both right
For all of the criticism (plenty of it is valid) of the Blues' defense, they were crucial in the first four goals the Blues scored. Leddy's pinch on Neighbours' goal, Krug's set-up to Buchnevich, and Faulk's being a monster all over the ice on the other two.
I expect the Blues to embrace the continually rising trend of active defense. This year, I've already seen so many goals scored by defensemen driving straight to the net, not just on the rush or clean setups off the cycle, but also for rebounds.
Multiple times last night, Tarasenko smoothly, instinctively filled in when Krug pinched. That's simply going to be a thing with Krug on the ice, but I think it's going to be a prominent feature of the entire team all year. And I think it's not just going to help them keep up, but flourish at times because their defense, as a whole, is clearly above average at making something out of offensive zone chaos.
Krug made an atrocious decision at the red line. Faulk was already caught flat footed behind the play when he pinched trying to keep the play alive in our zone and was late to it. Krug stepped up on Oliver at the red line despite Oliver having an outlet. Oliver passed the puck to his outlet and Kyrou suddenly was left alone to defend the rush. Faulk and Krug were the last 2 back.Kyrou definitely takes a lot of blame for that goal as well. Both Kyrou and Binner made bad plays on that play. Id even said that fact that Kyrou was the last man back means the defense should also take some blame as well.
Boys took a beating game 1.
Seemed like 'Bus had a chip on their shoulder. Jenner was absolutely berating a fan after his goal.
huh…that would explain some of my test results in my engineering classesThat just goes to prove that even in small amounts, alcohol and math don't mix.
The funny thing is that the trade thread for Schenn was littered with Flyers fans saying he's only good on the PP.I’m a big fan of Braden Schenn. Just not on the PP.
The funny thing is that the trade thread for Schenn was littered with Flyers fans saying he's only good on the PP.
Ahhh, I meant to say Kyrou being the Last line of defense was the Defenders fault. But, definitely. There is a lot of Blame to go around between Binner, Kyrou, and the Defense on that play.Krug made an atrocious decision at the red line. Faulk was already caught flat footed behind the play when he pinched trying to keep the play alive in our zone and was late to it. Krug stepped up on Oliver at the red line despite Oliver having an outlet. Oliver passed the puck to his outlet and Kyrou suddenly was left alone to defend the rush. Faulk and Krug were the last 2 back.
No they didn’t. Blues way outhit them.Boys took a beating game 1.
Seemed like 'Bus had a chip on their shoulder. Jenner was absolutely berating a fan after his goal.
Flyers fans also thought us hiring Berube was a bad decision so yeah, they definitely don’t know anything.The funny thing is that the trade thread for Schenn was littered with Flyers fans saying he's only good on the PP.
No that is what you said. My apologies. I was agreeing with you that the D took some blame. And I was placing more of that portion of the blame on Krug, since he made the risky play with Faulk already out of the play.Ahhh, I meant to say Kyrou being the Last line of defense was the Defenders fault. But, definitely. There is a lot of Blame to go around between Binner, Kyrou, and the Defense on that play.
All good. Just saying different words with the same meaning. Lol.No that is what you said. My apologies. I was agreeing with you that the D took some blame. And I was placing more of that portion of the blame on Krug, since he made the risky play with Faulk already out of the play.
pretty sure it was kurley ...i noticed that too. after a columbus goal one of their players was really chirping or taunting a fan near the glass. not sure why he was so butthurt but it was not a good look.
And it's probably hard for some fans to truly wrap their head around, since it's such a drastic shift for how our defense was previously deployed as recently as 19/20 with essentially the same coaching staff, but our defense group is now designed to be be very active offensively. We'll get burned at times as the forwards learn to cover for the increase in pinching D, but we are banking on it paying off more often than not, and I think it's a good bet based on the players we have.For all of the criticism (plenty of it is valid) of the Blues' defense, they were crucial in the first four goals the Blues scored. Leddy's pinch on Neighbours' goal, Krug's set-up to Buchnevich, and Faulk's being a monster all over the ice on the other two.
I expect the Blues to embrace the continually rising trend of active defense. This year, I've already seen so many goals scored by defensemen driving straight to the net, not just on the rush or clean setups off the cycle, but also for rebounds.
Multiple times last night, Tarasenko smoothly, instinctively filled in when Krug pinched. That's simply going to be a thing with Krug on the ice, but I think it's going to be a prominent feature of the entire team all year. And I think it's not just going to help them keep up, but flourish at times because their defense, as a whole, is clearly above average at making something out of offensive zone chaos.
Binnington looked confident out there. Ran into some bad luck with a puck off Parayko's nose and misplayed the pokecheck on goal number two, but he's playing with confidence. When he's doing that he's really fun to watch as a fellow goalie.
Can you go into more detail on this? I have no internal goalie knowledge, but I thought he looked a little awkward and sluggish early and he made an identical failed pokecheck attempt against Chinakhov after getting burned on the first one. That seemed odd to me. I'd love to hear insights and what you might have noticed in person.
It comes down to aggressiveness with Binnington, in my eyes. When he's struggling he gets caught too deep in his net and gives the shooters too much net to shoot at. He can also get too aggressive at times but I didn't see a lot of that in the opener. That said, I was up in 307 and I was focused mostly on the transition game and the offense when I watched parts of the game after the fact. The 'idea' of the poke check itself was fine but he has to stay more upright on that. I didn't see the second to comment on it.Can you go into more detail on this? I have no internal goalie knowledge, but I thought he looked a little awkward and sluggish early and he made an identical failed pokecheck attempt against Chinakhov after getting burned on the first one. That seemed odd to me. I'd love to hear insights and what you might have noticed in person.
We may have out hit them on paper, but 'bus was pretty chippy in the scrums.No they didn’t. Blues way outhit them.
And berating a fan? What?
Looking at that poke check from my goalie perspective, I hated that decision. I thought he committed too it far too early and gave the shooter far too much time and space to make a play. Kursaly was able to read it and just chip it over top. Plus with committing so early it opened up all of the top portion of the net.It comes down to aggressiveness with Binnington, in my eyes. When he's struggling he gets caught too deep in his net and gives the shooters too much net to shoot at. He can also get too aggressive at times but I didn't see a lot of that in the opener. That said, I was up in 307 and I was focused mostly on the transition game and the offense when I watched parts of the game after the fact. The 'idea' of the poke check itself was fine but he has to stay more upright on that. I didn't see the second to comment on it.