HOH Top 60 Goaltenders of All Time (2024 Edition) - Round 2, Vote 12

Only 349 goalies have played 100 NHL games. So a top 600 would likely include a few HoH board members haha
A quick check shows X-Penguins cannon fodder Andy Chiodo as around the bottom rung of the top 600 goalies in games played, which, lol.

A quick era-related count of our top 60 and assuming a similar ratio (which would absolutely not hold, but whatever), would have among the bottom rung of goalies on the top 600 include Scott Darling, Jim Hrivnak, Julian Klimkiw and Red Spooner.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Yozhik v tumane
We're not besmirching the Chiodo Dragon, are we?!?!

He's such a beauty that I'd definitely have him in my top 500 haha
That's a fantastic nickname.
I most remember the Nashville game, and given that game is wholly 12.5% of his career, I suppose his numbers are a little better than you'd expect
 
I'm trying to piece together some more AS voting from the McNeil days, which have some weak coverage. 1952, in particular, is almost tantalizingly illogical. I strongly suspect that McNeil was a very, very close 3rd that year.

I'm reading through a lot of 1952 articles. One from late February (so, quite late in the season at this point) that said that Sugar Jim Henry was washed up and sent to the minors for not being good enough and that he'll never get any recognition* or anything...but he's provided some spark for the Bruins this year. But, ultimately, seems like he snuck a weak 2-AS out of it.

But I found this article that matches the film on these guys...

THN Mar 29 1952 said:
If the game proved nothing else it did show that the Habs have the best clutch goaler in the National Hockey League in one Gerry McNeil. It was just about this time last season that the little guy started to show his real brilliance.

...

(On Al Rollins)...played some sensational hockey in the 14 games between the two teams he failed to impress on the shots he should have stopped with ease. Some of his saves bordered on the miraculous and others ranked with the boobs of the year.

That's consistent with goalies that just sort fall all over the floor. You have no idea what you're going to get.

They then proceed to draw out a play where young Doug Harvey scored on Rollins from beyond center haha

1738203948367.png


EDIT: * - In the next issue, Jack Adams and Tommy Ivan were consulted for creating an All-Consolation Team.

The criteria is:
In every case, the leading candidates are known and no winner will be surprise to the public. The names have been repeated often — Howe, Kelly, Lindsay, Sawchuk, Smith, Richard, Raleigh, Harvey, Buller, and the others.

Thus at this point dozens of earnest players tend to go unrecognized. As a modest recognition of their endeavors, today two teams are presented of players who have two basic qualifications: 1 — None has a chance in the regular election; — 2 All are honest hockey workers in the medium salary range.

And, sure enough, Sugar Jim Henry was named to this "aw schucks" team haha

I suppose there's no chance that the NHL has the 2AS wrong all these years...but man, the writers and coaches are sure making it seem that way. The math of it all doesn't exactly quell the fear either...
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Yozhik v tumane
We'd be discussing whether Pat Jablonski belongs in the second or the third tier.

Dude doesn't even wear his gloves on the correct hands. Very Bob Saget, if you ask me:

1738270312580.png


(Bob was a big hockey fan and evidently put the leg pads on backwards as a joke.)
 
Tim Thomas has been the collective punching bag on this forum. I think we were right to not have him in our top 50, but the list of names this round is really thin. Ron Hextal is the only other goalie with multiple major awards (Conn Smythe/Vezina). Thomas has three (Conn Smythe/two Vezina). I don't want to trophy count, but we are so far down the list there's nobody left with a great resume.

He's one of four goalies left to have led in GSAA (Thomas, Kolzig, Peeters, Hextal) and the only one to do it twice.

Unless we induct Vernon, we're likely getting the last four spots to be non-HHOFers. The depth for goaltending is just plain weak as a position. So to leave off a two-time Vezina winner, this deep in the project, with this thin of names remaining, just feels wrong.
 
Tim Thomas has been the collective punching bag on this forum. I think we were right to not have him in our top 50, but the list of names this round is really thin. Ron Hextal is the only other goalie with multiple major awards (Conn Smythe/Vezina). Thomas has three (Conn Smythe/two Vezina). I don't want to trophy count, but we are so far down the list there's nobody left with a great resume.

He's one of four goalies left to have led in GSAA (Thomas, Kolzig, Peeters, Hextal) and the only one to do it twice.

Unless we induct Vernon, we're likely getting the last four spots to be non-HHOFers. The depth for goaltending is just plain weak as a position. So to leave off a two-time Vezina winner, this deep in the project, with this thin of names remaining, just feels wrong.
I'd feel better about Thomas if I didn't feel like those performances were a fluke. He was so unimpressive when he wasn't playing Vezina/Conn Smythe level. It almost feels like those performances were a doppleganger wearing his jersey.

I'm definitely not in favor of inducting Vernon though. I fully believe he shouldn't be a HHOFer.
 
We have enough names clearly better than Thomas. We don't need to dumpster dive and cheapen the list, we've made it this far. It's a minor league/fringe talent.

"Leave off" is only a product of the arbitrary number 60. If it was a top 50, would he suddenly have a claim for 46th?
 
We have enough names clearly better than Thomas. We don't need to dumpster dive and cheapen the list, we've made it this far. It's a minor league/fringe talent.

"Leave off" is only a product of the arbitrary number 60. If it was a top 50, would he suddenly have a claim for 46th?
Do you feel like Thomas caught lightning in a bottle a couple of times? It just doesn't make sense to me that he had the two years that he had. Maybe you'd even say that the performance wasn't there in those years and it was dumb luck?

You and I have very different ways of looking at this list I know, but we seem to be in agreement on Thomas now. I guess I'm wondering what's bringing us together here and why we're different from the rest of the group on this (at least by my impressions we are).
 
I'd feel better about Thomas if I didn't feel like those performances were a fluke. He was so unimpressive when he wasn't playing Vezina/Conn Smythe level. It almost feels like those performances were a doppleganger wearing his jersey.

I'm definitely not in favor of inducting Vernon though. I fully believe he shouldn't be a HHOFer.
Outside of his vezina years he still has 2 seasons finishing top 10 in sv% and 3 seasons top 10 in GSAA.

Granted, all of the above seasons with the exception of 2005-06 he was on the best defensive team in the NHL.

2005-06 is the only sample size to show he can put up really good numbers without being on a powerhouse team, but it's only a 38 games

2006-07 it's pretty easy to cut him some slack considering the team was bottom of the barrel in GA and GF. Interestingly enough, his stats were nearly identical to 22 year old MAF despite being on a way worse team..

Same with 2013-14. That Panthers team was godawful. 2nd to last in both GA and GF. Not to mention he was 39 years old.. he wouldn't be the first goaltender whose play suddenly fell off a cliff at that age.


I do think his vezina years aren't as good as the stats suggest. I mean, he was clearly getting tons of help from the team in front of him and his workload was incredibly easy. He was never top 10 in GP other than 2006, and only finished top 10 in saves twice, a in 2006 and his 2nd vezina season.

But the seasons outside of his vezina years aren't as bad as people think.. and the worst ones can easily be explained by being on awful teams.
 
Do you feel like Thomas caught lightning in a bottle a couple of times? It just doesn't make sense to me that he had the two years that he had. Maybe you'd even say that the performance wasn't there in those years and it was dumb luck?

You and I have very different ways of looking at this list I know, but we seem to be in agreement on Thomas now. I guess I'm wondering what's bringing us together here and why we're different from the rest of the group on this (at least by my impressions we are).
The reason why I treat this list like I do is because you get the luxury of lessening team effects. And very specifically, a situation like Thomas. Like, not to be ad populum about it...but come on, we know that he's rubbish, right? I'm not saying what happened didn't happen. But that's a really bad goalie...just like Cechmanek (who, depending on how you value things, has a better resume), just like two-time "save pct. superstar" Brian Elliott, etc.

Ya know, it's not like Thomas is the only bad goalie in history to have good things happen to him. That's the nature of the position, especially in the last 30 years.

I'm not sure which way to go with the post, to be honest. Do I go macro level and beat the drum of team effects on goalies or do I talk about Thomas? I mean, who really is on the fence about Thomas at this point? haha

You're either sticking to your guns because you thought he was good in 2011 and aren't open to evolving on that or you're a "don't care, just give me the stats and awards" type or you don't have time for him because he doesn't meet any of the following criteria:
- Sustained peak
- Long-term success (Not even predominantly an NHLer: 8.5 seasons in the minors, 7.5 in the NHL)
- Varied success in multiple environments
- Talent evaluation
- Backup goalie performs as well (or whatever)
- Level of competition for goaltending/very weak international record as he couldn't get ice time over many non-NHLers
- etc.

Two is a really low number. Elliott had two. Cechmanek had three in the NHL alone. Anything can happen in that time. Maruk had two 50-goal seasons and then was mostly just a 30ish goal guy. Jamie Benn has an 1st and 2nd place point finish but no other point per game finishes. Ryan Graves led the league in +/- and finished 9th another year, but he's like a 6/7 d-man and is a regular healthy scratch on one of the worst teams in the league at 29 years old.

It's not even like a hard two...it was non-consecutive seasons with 53 and 55 starts. It's not like he's throwing down 150 straight games of being diesel and then he has a playoff in there. It's a couple of 50 game spots, in the between, the rookie backup had a sub-2 GAA and led the league in save pct....but it's a couple of 50 game spots, a horribly uneven playoff where he gave up a ton of goals...and then another where they were upset by a fairly weak Carolina team thanks to his untidy keeping on Scott Walker (IIRC).

I think we all know the numbers with/without Julien
Tim Thomas - Not Julien​
Tim Thomas - W/Julien​
[td]
63
[/td][td]
67
[/td][td]
18
[/td][td]
430
[/td][td]
8704
[/td][td]
2.964
[/td][td]
4278
[/td][td]
4708
[/td][td]
0.9087
[/td][td]
4
[/td]
[td]
180
[/td][td]
99
[/td][td]
31
[/td][td]
705
[/td][td]
18859
[/td][td]
2.243
[/td][td]
9011
[/td][td]
9716
[/td][td]
0.9274
[/td][td]
33
[/td]

So, was it lightning in a bottle? I don't know...I don't think he played particularly well. It was very sloppy. Look at the amount of goals or in terms of the goals in individual games. Look at how many games in 2011 he gave up 4 and 5 goals in games vs. the goalies who won around him. It's massive. No one has ever won a Cup on averages or ratios. He put up slews of unwinnable games and just horrid goals based entirely on his horrible technique. The miracle is how much scoring Boston had to put up to overcome him. You see that stat line and think "oh, he gave up 2 goals per game - that's great!" Yeah, no. That's not what happened. He gave up 3 or more nine times. He gave up 4+ in 20% of those games. That's...really bad.

What's worse is that he has highlights because he wasn't in control. So, that adds something. Some folks like to claim that "it doesn't matter how they played" - and that's their right to feel that way - but part of the draw for some of those same people is him diving all over the place because it's approachable and people like to feel like a goalie is "working" instead of "just blocking".

We might be going about our list in different ways, our mindset might different...but Thomas crosses the suspension of disbelief in such a way that it's tough to reasonably accept him on this list with any logical consistency.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad