Middle of the pack isn't great... but I'll also go ahead and state again that goaltender stats aren't great. By your own links, Les Brinkley had a better SV% against the Habs in that time frame than Glen Hall, Jacques Plante, Gerry Cheevers, Roger Crozier, and Terry Sawchuk. Brinkley also had a better GAA than Sawchuk, Esposito, Crozier, and Vachon. I don't think we are feeling ready for Brinkley just yet, so perhaps we should take these stats with a large grain of salt.
If Les Binkley played that way against everybody he might make the list. A strong .915 save percentage against the Habs is offset by posting an .880 against the first two expansion years of the Buffalo Sabres.
Another case against goalie stats (or for, depending on your POV)- Mike Richter against the Detroit Red Wings. Using the same criteria (
link):
Richter is 58th in save percentage and 61st in GAA.
So, to compare Giacomin against the Habs and Richter against the Red Wings:
Name | Save Percentage Rank | GAA Rank |
Giacomin | 18th | 14th |
Richter | 58th | 61st |
If the Habs ate Giacomin's lunch, I think we can say Richter was similarly victimized by Detroit.
Or we can get away from how players fared against one team and look more at overall performances.
Here's the 1990s:
NHL Stats
Hey look, Hasek, Brodeur and Roy on top.
Richter's .905 is solid, and comparable to Vanbiesbrouck (.906) and Belfour (.906). Also Kolzig shows up here with a .904, but given the timing of their games, I'd say Richter's numbers are a tad better at first glance.
Or put another way, over the 1990s, he has a GA-% of 91. That's a solid 10-year average, considering Giacomin only has 2 individual seasons better than that.
Yeah, Giacomin did not perform well in the playoffs. Nobody is arguing otherwise.
There are 10 guys listed here who did better, and deserve votes more than him.
Yes, Giacomin played poorly in the playoffs. That should (has, and does) count against him. However, he has the best remaining post-season all star record. That should (has, and does) count in his favor.
The All-Star record is his entire case. That's a questionable stat once you dig in and see it's basically a GP trophy (for Giacomin).
Fast Eddie gets a 1st AS nomination as the only 30-win goalie win a league where splitting the schedule is becoming normalized.
Does that make 1967 Giacomin more valuable than Mike Richter in 1994? 4th in All star votes and 6th in Vezina votes. Here are the Vezina vote getters:
EDIT here is a link: 1993-94 NHL Awards Voting | Hockey-Reference.com
I apologize to anyone who saw this when it was a table...
Richter also leads the NHL in wins, but by golly, that's competition that's miles ahead of a half season of Dennis DeJordy (0 1st-half votes) and half-season of Charlie Hodge (0 2nd-half votes), the goalies who finished 2nd in each half.
THEN you combine that with Giacomin having a rough time in the playoffs (understandable given his team strength, but it did feed into his reputation as a choker), and Mike Richter being 1994 Mike Richter (Looks like 18 Quality Starts in 23 games, 16.7 GSAA in 23 games, plenty of good press quotes if you want to look).
I don't know how you look at that and conclude that Eddie Giacomin was anywhere close to Mike Richter in terms of quality, even if he gets the 1st Team All-Star nod.
Couple that with Richter being the reason for Vanbiesbrouck having virtually no international goaltending experience after 1987, because Richter was getting praised as the guy leading Team USA to their best finishes ever. Look at the highlights of 1996. For all the big names on the blue line, they left their boy on an island a lot - and he delivered (as the equivalent of a 1st team All Star in 1996 and 2002 if that's what floats your boat).
Yeah there's a reason that guy is one of the best penalty shot stoppers of all-time.