seventieslord
Student Of The Game
I'm sure your discrediting means a lot to the people who put hours of research and debate into putting this list together.
You are wrong. It doesn't.
I'm sure your discrediting means a lot to the people who put hours of research and debate into putting this list together.
You are wrong. It doesn't.
Even as someone that voted Brodeur at 3, I don't think it's so unbelievable to have him at 6 that I would throw my crayons across the floor...while I disagree that he belongs at 6, it wasn't done on a whim...
If I wanted him on a list at 3, I would have went through my own process...with blackjack...and hookers...in fact...forget the list!
Thomas came up big in the OT sessions in Game 4 and 5 against Montreal though, I'll give him that. He wasn't good in the first three games, although the entire Bruins team was very flat to open that series.
Thomas' biggest sin that spring in my eyes was the Tampa Bay series, Game 4 in particular. That series never should have gone 7 games.
VN: If I remember...I talked to, for example, Dryden. I scored some goals from long distances because he late [sic - perhaps a typo in the article]. I think he was using glasses at that time. He told me, "I have such a bad memory about you because you scored all the time."
Where does Carey Price rank on this list as of today?
If he's not yet done enough to crack the top 40, what about as of age 29? Who else is above him at age 29?
Or - is it maybe too difficult to rank a goalie as of age 29, since so many goalies peaks and prime happens past that point? It's maybe easier to discuss "as of age 29" for forwards because usually most of the peak/prime is done, and you can "project" what rest of career may look like. And goalies are maybe a bit more unpredictable than forwards in that sense.
Would be curious to hear some opinions though on Price, if any.
What about Lundqvist - how high has he moved up since 2012?
Ranking by age for goaltenders is not going to get you anything, for reasons that you seem to already understand. But I think Carey Price would probably come up short in a top-40 list, just as Miikka Kiprusoff did.
Bernie Parent at 17 below Ed Belfour is downright histerical.
That's my take as well. If a goalie doesn't definitely pass Kiprusoff, he isn't a Top-40 goaltender of all time. I think he did, but I can't say he definitely did. He's about one above-average season to make it definitely.
I do have so issues reconciling this with Bernard Parent's ranking, however. Parent's ranking is perfectly justified, don't get me wrong. But let's say Price has a season similar to 14-15 (it actually doesn't have to be as good as 14-15)... I'd have a very hard time justifying Price below Parent.
It'll be like one of those roller coasters with an absurdly fast ascent. That's just the nature of the position, I suppose. One excellent season? Not on the list, because it might have been an anomaly. Two seasons, but no championships? #35-45 range. Three seasons or a championship? Probably a #15-20 goaltender. (not so fast, Thomas)
My fear is that Brian Elliott wins a Conn Smythe.
Parent lacks starter years to be significantly higher than that + yeah, he was absolutely awesome for a few seasons, but it coincided perfectly with the period where the NHL was at its absolute weakest.
He won a vezina at age of 25.
So? If he didn't die who knows but he's ranked properly
As a swede i think he was better than Lundqvist.
I am born in 69 so yes.And I'm to assume that you saw him play?