billingtons ghost
Registered User
- Nov 29, 2010
- 10,689
- 7,055
In case it makes you feel better, I watched nearly every season of Kelly Hrudey's career live.
And your response doesn't indicate if you think that I'm overrating Hrudey or underrating Hrudey. And in either case, who are you where your opinion is automatically the one that everyone should bow down to?
"Should be all anyone ever needs to know about the sanctity of your poll and what stats do to warp opinions." Get off of your high horse.
It's probably pretty easy to sit back and take pot-shots at others' opinions. Why don't you make some statements of your own, and let us pick them apart?
high horse? Am I permitted to speak or did I get my one reply? You started out on the high horse here, and you're the one that went diving into a debate waving your list as the end-all, ok? That's what got me here.
It is nice you guys did some work to educate everyone about pre-1950 players, and it is nice that informed folks were polled and offered their opinions.
I offered that it would be interesting to do a generational thing because it is tough for folks to compare apples to oranges - especially when they have never seen guys play. Sorry that seems to have been a terrible thing to say.
I get it - you are a stats guy and 'X' of these makes this player better than 'Y' of those.
I can't offer any opinions about guys I haven't seen play - because three WC MVPs doesn't mean diddly to me. Truly. You have done a noble thing in trying.
I did see Hrudey play alot with the Isles. I did watch Liut extensively with Hartford and the Caps and I did see Richter and Lundqvist. If some folks who watched those guys play too want to debate something - I'm ok.
Enough with the condescension. You win - I won't come back.