Highest Potential : Hagens, McKenna, Dupont or Schultz?

[JotAlan]

I get the Dupont bump and Schultz looks interesting for his age but he still has to pass McKenna and I'm not even sure that Hagens is the 4th best non drafted prospect in the world right now in terms of potential.

How do you classify the 4?

 

[Junohockeyfan]

I just don’t get the hubbub with Hagens. There is nothing dynamic about him. I just don’t think he will be a 1C.

 

[Golden_Jet]

Hagens is getting a lot of crap overall in recent months and I don’t understand it. He’s been by far the best player on a very disappointing and frankly not that talented team all season.

He’s not the best player on the team, and he’s on the top ranked team in the US

 

[wetcoast]

How do you classify the 4?

I don't know enough about Schultz yet but would slot him 3rd behind dupont who is 31 and McKenna with Hagens 4th but a lot of this is guessing on development which doesn't always work out.

I think Schultz might get close to McKenna but it's a really big guess right now.

 

[Sasha Orlov]

DuPont AINEC

 

[Pavel Buchnevich]

Hagens is getting underrated, per usual here. He’d be destroying any junior league and would be classified with unlimited potential.

Anyway, DuPont has the highest potential of those that’ve reached juniors. He has the highest potential of any player of the 2000’s. Needs to grow taller though.

Hagens vs. McKenna is close. I’d give McKenna a slight edge. I think he has better scoring skills. Hagens has a higher floor as a better defensive player and also a center with roughly comparable offense.

Not going to include a dude who hasn’t played high level competitive hockey in with those that have. Can’t really judge Schultz. We’ll see about him soon enough.