irishock
Fire Ken Holland
Do you guys know where I can get data for high danger scoring chances per game? Thanks in advance
Do you guys know where I can get data for high danger scoring chances per game? Thanks in advance
with war-on-ice offline, does anyone know of a currently operating website with sortable hd sv%,md sv%, ld sv% ?
I'm hoping to add this to Corsica over the Summer. It's been the most common request since day one.
Check out sporting charts.
Won't give you a list like war-on-ice did but you can compare shot charts for 2 players at a time.
I'm hoping to add this to Corsica over the Summer. It's been the most common request since day one.
As the guy who saw langes Shot quality curves in 2006.
I recognized importance of the Bubble in the curves near the net.
It is a shame he did not recognize the HSCA area.
I had been looking for work that related to a concept that stuck in my brain since I first saw the Flin Flon bombers of Clarke; Leach; Stoughton.
The violence was about :
go to the net
Defend the net.
I was never going to be able to Present the databases that we see now.
But anyone who's been on lowetide's site know's the concepts I have fought up river to defend for the last 10 years.
1. Situational expected performance ranges for
-Competition based on Even production
- Teamates
- ZS
Behind the net was what made me consider this approach.
to get expected range of
CF; SF; GF;
CA; SA; GA:
Cdiff; S diff; Gdiff
for any given player.
the 3 values are broken up into 864 groups:
on 3 axis graph.
not much long after Rob Vollman came up with a single basic 2 D graph
were you could
Pick you 2 axis
Comp; team; ZS
results were displayed as a color based on neg or positive results with increased bubble amplitude.
Most use Comp/ZS
And look at Corsi
Which excludes team affect.
it does not tell you what a players performance is compared to expected.
If you take the 96 groups.
1st;2nd; 3rd; 4th comp - 4variables
1st; 2nd; 3rd; 4th comp - 4 variables
Zone starts broken up by STnd devations - 6 variables.
4 X 4 X 6 = 96
you take all the Forawrd and Dman and can establish an average for a given situation.
Adam Larson;
1st comp; 1st team; 31% ZS
Expected GD -17
You can further break each group into a series of groups that forams a cube around the situational average.
Comp Upr; mid; lower - 3 variables
Team Upr; mid; Lower - 3 variables
3 X 3 = 9 groups
UPR C - UPR T; UPR C - MID T; UPR C - LWR T
MID C - UPR T; MID C - MID T; MID C - LWR T
LWR C - UPR T; LWR C - MID T; LWR C - LWR T
So we can take Larsson further situation
Upr 1st comp; LWR 1st team; 31% ZS
Datas average says
expected Goal diff is -24
Expected range for U1st C; lwr 1st T ; 30% ZS
is -17 to -24
Larsson was +15 Last year
32 to 41 Goal diff better than expected.
I would like to see the Corsi, Shot; Gola data further broken down into
Low scoring chance area shots.
High scoring chance Area shots.
Now to my point!
War on ice established there line in the sand. For HSCA shots.
I loved seeing there site.
But comparing their Database results to my Extensive years of manual stripping of data results.
I realized they used the wrong line in the sand.
I discussed this on lowetides site and 2 days later they changed it.
You want your low scoring chance area to be all shots that are below League average shooting %.
0.0 to 8.5%
You want your your High scoring chance area to be all shots above league average
shooting %. 8.5 to 20%
There is still the most important factor affecting GF and GA.
I have to continue to fight up river defending.
There are Posters on Lowetides site Woodguy/Gmoney that are breaking down players measure
for the levels of comp Faced based on Standard deviations and presenting them as expected Dangerous Fenwick.
understanding that HSCA is the critical area of the game.
it largely ignores teammates and ZS.
and grouping is different.
But does tell who is strong or weak against diffrent levels of comp.
Which takes it to a much more simplified presentation like Vollman's.
your site is amazing:
But your work was flawed the instant you took out shooting affect.
Players like eberle who have that flin flon bomber tough.
Stone to go to HSCA area.
deliver an elite shooting %
Your data needs that LSC area and HSC area separation.
I'm sorry, I'm really trying to understand what is is you're trying to say and I just can't. You say my work is flawed and I would like to understand how that is in a manner that is comprehensible.
you state you ignore these situational factors.
Do you guys know where I can get data for high danger scoring chances per game? Thanks in advance
FYI, according to their twitter, naturalstattrick will also be adding scoring chance data to their site.
Corsica.hockey just added L/M/H danger scoring chances to their website.
Can you send me a link for this? Im trying to find it but can't seem to locate it on the site
I finally found a stat for defense I like, thank you..Meant to split that up, sorry. My mistake.
They added L/M/H Sv% splits for goalies, and Scoring Chances stats to skaters.
Added GSAA for goalies as well.
You will have to scroll sideways to find it for both.
I finally found a stat for defense I like, thank you..
SCA/60 tells a pretty good story...
There isn't any that I am aware of and there shouldn't be to be honest. There simply isn't any data available that is accurate enough to be useful. I have tracked quality shots manually for the Blackhawks the last two seasons. The data coming from the NHL site is so wrong it is a joke.
Average shot locations from each stadium vary dramatically. Some sites put everything much closer to the net than others. Even different official scorers from the same stadium are radically different. Individual shots in the same game vary greatly as some shots are located from the beginning of the shot and some from the follow through.
And the overall accuracy itself is mostly random. Shots directly in front of the net are routinely measured in the 20 foot range. And something that shows up in the 30 foot range can be a shot from the point. Until there is tracking in uniforms, this data will produce random results.