VanillaCoke
Registered User
- Oct 30, 2013
- 27,049
- 13,940
Yeah it's horrific. Outside of Bob there was nothing special last post season.It showed in the playoffs too. I don't know if it's new equipment or a new league wide play-style or something but there was a lot of average at best goaltending last postseason
That’s one way to look at it. It’s also not too relevant to what I’ve been stating that Jarry has never had a bad season. He’s never been below league average in SV% during his career. You’re basically taking the absolute prime of Kuemper’s career to say he’s better than Jarry. Obviously recent years matter, but you can’t divorce that from the fact that you took the prime window for Kuemper, ignored that he wasn’t as good previously and has had bad seasons before then (not an irrelevant consideration), and aren’t accounting for that Kuemper is now on the downside while Jarry is entering that five year prime window.GSAx rank courtesy of moneypuck.com (min. 10 games played):
Kuemper:
22/23 - 16
21/22 - 5
20/21 - 24
19/20 - 6
18/19 - 13
Jarry:
22/23 - 48
21/22 - 11
20/21 - 57
19/20 - 27
18/19 - N/A
Cumulative standard stats from nhl.com over the past five years (min. 15 games played):
Kuemper: 10th in SV%, 4th in SO
Jarry: 19th in SV%, 14th in SO
Kuemper is clearly the superior goaltender while Jarry is more erratic.
Sure, he also doesn't regularly outperform Kuemper in any relevant goaltending statistic either.That’s one way to look at it. It’s also not too relevant to what I’ve been stating that Jarry has never had a bad season. He’s never been below league average in SV% during his career.
I clearly stated in my first post I was looking at the last five years. Considering Jarry's service time in the NHL (and as a starter) I think it's perfectly reasonable. If you want to argue that Jarry is a better goaltender because Kuemper had some average seasons in the league before he arrived be my guest, but objectively there's nothing Jarry does better.You’re basically taking the absolute prime of Kuemper’s career to say he’s better than Jarry. Obviously recent years matter, but you can’t divorce that from the fact that you took the prime window for Kuemper, ignored that he wasn’t as good previously and has had bad seasons before then (not an irrelevant consideration), and aren’t accounting for that Kuemper is now on the downside while Jarry is entering that five year prime window.
Well no, that’s your subjective opinion that Jarry does nothing better. Of the five seasons they’ve been in the league together, Jarry has one better season, Kuemper has three, and there was also a season they had the same SV%. I don’t argue against the point that Kuemper has had better numbers the last five years. That was not the point of my argument, so I’m not sure we are disagreeing about the specifics, yet you seem to be calling your opinion the objective truth, while also seemingly acknowledging that my argument has validity. I’m not going to argue semantics though, so that’s where I’ll end my side of our discussion about this.Sure, he also doesn't regularly outperform Kuemper in any relevant goaltending statistic either.
I clearly stated in my first post I was looking at the last five years. Considering Jarry's service time in the NHL (and as a starter) I think it's perfectly reasonable. If you want to argue that Jarry is a better goaltender because Kuemper had some average seasons in the league before he arrived be my guest, but objectively there's nothing Jarry does better.
No, it's the most logical conclusion based on objective numbers from reputable sources. I'm sorry facts hurt your feelings.Well no, that’s your subjective opinion that Jarry does nothing better. Of the five seasons they’ve been in the league together, Jarry has one better season, Kuemper has three, and there was also a season they had the same SV%. I don’t argue against the point that Kuemper has had better numbers the last five years. That was not the point of my argument, so I’m not sure we are disagreeing about the specifics, yet you seem to be calling your opinion the objective truth, while also seemingly acknowledging that my argument has validity. I’m not going to argue semantics though, so that’s where I’ll end my side of our discussion about this.
I wouldn't say they are meh. They're all just so close.It's crazy lol. For me it's after #6. Everyone after that is just MEH
It's Meh for me. They are close yes but still not that good compared to the previous eraI wouldn't say they are meh. They're all just so close.
Wouldn't be surprised if any of them gets hot and goes on a run. Goalies are a gong show.
I mostly don’t have much issue with it, but as I said earlier on in the polls, some of them have benefited from recency bias.
Raanta is actually one of the most low key overrated goalies there is.I’d argue Swayman is a top 20 on that list & didn’t even get an honourable mention lol
Raanta somehow got on this?
Wait, you’re upset he gave up a few soft goals and otherwise played well getting outplayed by the best goalie in the league?Raanta is actually one of the most low key overrated goalies there is.
Because he posts good numbers as a (mostly) career backup and mostly always has.
But he has a penchant for letting in some of the softest, leakiest, bull shit goals. He killed the Canes in game 6 of the 2022 series against the Rangers with two killer softies in the opening 10 minutes of the game at MSG. And then another killer softy early in game 7. Those three goals were worse than anything Shesterkin has ever allowed in the playoffs. Shesterkin wasn’t allowing goals like that and Raanta did. That was the difference in that series. I was waiting for the Devils to get a chance to play him that series, which the Canes kept saying he would get a start that series but he never did lol.
Raanta has a history throughout his career or either just not being good enough to be a starting goaltender or getting injured and losing it by the time he finally gets a starting job, like in Arizona, which he quickly lost to Kuemper after he got injured (which is the one constant in his career, getting injured) and never got it back.
Raanta may be the most overrated goaltender that isn’t universally overrated.
Grubauer over Skinner is a joke.
Korpisalo at 24th is a joke. More recency bias on that. Korpisalo has been a terrible goalie in his career, but had an up season.
As an outspoken critic of Binnington and current MAF, I don’t think I would have raged with them being in the top 26 over Korpisalo and Grubauer.
No. Not at all. This is really questionable. So is Kuemper, and Jarry.Is Demko really 8th?
Demko’s issue is that he gets overused and breaks down. He doesn’t have the durability to play over 80% of a team’s games… but the Canucks have to lean on him if they hope to have any chance at all to make the playoffs.I'd give it a pass.
Demko is the only goalie that I remember seriously carrying a series win after 2016-17 Jake Allen. And I dont mean couple amazing saves in one game, I mean just carrying several games for a team that had no business being there.
He's played in only 15 playoff games and half have been great and half have been awful. Check his regular season numbers, they're average to downright putrid. Much larger sample too.Recency bias?
Korpisalo has career playoff saves of 92,2%, but that came from the CBJ.
View attachment 736980
Playoff teams value playoff success. I would pick Korpisalo before Vitek Vanecek for a playoff run just because he has better playoffs stats and is more experienced.
View attachment 736983