GDT: HFBoards GDT: 12/23/2024 | The last 13 games before Christmas

Bounces R Way

Registered User
Nov 18, 2013
37,635
60,672
Weegartown
Is that Ken Daniels calling this Amazon game? Didn't he already work today?

66 years old still pulling doubles the day before Christmas eve, what a beast
 
Last edited:

BoHorvat 53

What's a god to a Kane
Dec 9, 2014
4,086
2,383
That 4th goal is why people with even a fraction of a brain should want Miller gone if one of him or Pettersson gotta go - he's still an elite player. Hopefully they all get their heads out of their asses though
 
  • Like
Reactions: robertocarlos

canadianmagpie

Registered User
Jan 26, 2010
5,544
1,510
Bullshit. He was at the top of the crease. Askarov has to be able to move .

He probably shouldn't have moved his stick into Garland's then. He caused the issue with Garland outside of the crease.

Well the league agreed with you. He had his foot in the blue (and went in on his own), I thought that was how they were calling it.

He was outside of the crease. It was Askarov moving his stick into Garland's which caused the contact. It was pretty clear on the replay.
 

Boss Man Hughes

Registered User
Mar 15, 2022
18,857
12,930
He probably shouldn't have moved his stick into Garland's then. He caused the issue with Garland outside of the crease.



He was outside of the crease. It was Askarov moving his stick into Garland's which caused the contact. It was pretty clear on the replay.
The sticks are irrelevant, Garland had a foot in the crease and was in his way preventing him from making the save. if he was completely outside the crease it would have been fine.
 
  • Like
Reactions: karltonian

RedRocking

Chazz Michael McMichael
Jan 8, 2022
7,749
9,337
NoCal
He probably shouldn't have moved his stick into Garland's then. He caused the issue with Garland outside of the crease.



He was outside of the crease. It was Askarov moving his stick into Garland's which caused the contact. It was pretty clear on the replay.
I dunno. On the replays I saw (Sharks broadcast) Garland’s leg was in the crease. If that’s the case, it doesn’t matter who initiated contact.

But, if they thought the majority of the contact started outside the crease, then maybe that’s the reasoning.

In any event, I like that they that let that stand. They’ve just been extremely tight calling it on everything this season. I wish they would let more stand.
 

canadianmagpie

Registered User
Jan 26, 2010
5,544
1,510
The sticks are irrelevant, Garland had a foot in the crease and was in his way preventing him from making the save. if he was completely outside the crease it would have been fine.

Askarov dragged Garland in by hooking his stick. That's where the contact begins and it's Askarov's fault for causing the contact. Garland's skate doesn't impact Askarov from making the save. Garland is getting hooked into the crease and is actually trying hard not to get dragged in. That's on Askarov 100%.
 
  • Like
Reactions: notsocommonsense

robertocarlos

Registered User
Sep 19, 2014
26,362
14,036
Prime is killing SN and TSN. Prime should broadcast way more games in the next few years. They can poach all the best talent. No more Scott Oake making $300k for 10 minutes of work. He'll probably have to work at least 20 hours a week for his $800k from Prime.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bounces R Way

Boss Man Hughes

Registered User
Mar 15, 2022
18,857
12,930
Askarov dragged Garland in by hooking his stick. That's where the contact begins and it's Askarov's fault for causing the contact. Garland's skate doesn't impact Askarov from making the save. Garland is getting hooked into the crease and is actually trying hard not to get dragged in. That's on Askarov 100%.
He was in the crease. idon't think there was contact but that should still be goalie interference. The idiot NHL probably doesn't consider that interference but I am sure you will see the same thing called goalie interference before the end of the year.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad